217
submitted 3 weeks ago by OutForARip@lemmy.ca to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ach@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago

It's not bigotry to be opposed to genital mutilation.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Using the term "mutilation" to describe someone's perfectly healthy penis, is a form of bigotry.

[-] Ach@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

There is zero biological reason to remove foreskin. It's objectively mutilation.

I'm circumsized. I did not give anyone permission to remove a part of my penis that was perfectly healthy when I was an infant and could not consent. I want you to quantify to me how I was not done wrong, and how my bodily autonomy was not violated. I understand that isn't the case in the article, but it's the perfect example for you to argue.

Also, just because a culture or religion does something doesn't mean I have to support it, and it definitely doesn't make me a bigot to oppose it. Iran will stone women to death under Sharia Law. Am I a bigot for saying stoning women is bad?

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago

Infant genital mutilation is disgusting and I think it's about time it's made illegal around the world. I'm sorry about your penis.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

It almost completely prevents balanitis in young boys, and has long term benefits in preventing other types of infections later in life. And that's on top of the fact that it's simply easier to keep clean, in general.

Equating that to stoning a woman under Sharia Law, is absurd and intellectually dishonest. Which is why making those types of comparisons is a form of bigotry. You are making ridiculous generalizations in order to denigrate other people.

[-] Ach@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

The WHO doean't support this, and I've lived and worked in medicine all over Africa. You teach them and support them with better self-care, not encouraging genital mutilation. No matter how much shit you sling at the wind, you can literally accomplish this by educating people to wash their dicks.

Refute my challenge you ignored. I never consented to being circumsized and I was circumsized for the same reason. Justify to me how my bodily autonomly wasn't violated as a baby when someone cut off a piece of my penis.

I want to hear your armchair quarterback mental gymnastic bullshit since we're actively trying to teach people all over Weat Africa to just wash your dick.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

You know how I know you don't actually work in medicine? Because you're using the term "mutilation" to describe a relatively benign medical procedure. Regardless of whether or not you view it as necessary...at the very least, you should know what that word actually implies...and you would know that it doesn't apply.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Apparently you either don't understand English or you're just angry that you have a mutilated dick.

Hey, I'd be angry too, if someone had mutilated my penis.

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

According to your first paragraph, we should just remove the pinky finger from all children because it just gets in the way, traps bacteria under the fingernail, and might get caught in a car door someday.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

'Easier to keep clean'.

So what other body modification should we do to infants to make them cleaner?

[-] ImNotThatPokable@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

They're always going on about cleaning in and behind the ears. Let's be honest here. Ears are pretty ugly and you don't need them to hear. You can prevent so many infections because cutting off the ear makes it easier to clean the ear canal.

infant Earectomy infection studyIt's a joke

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well then, ears it is!

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

You know what's hard to keep clean? An open wound on your dick. It's why these 41 people are dead.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 weeks ago

As someone who is perfectly comfortable with his circumcized penis: it's absolutely mutilation.

[-] fishy@lemmy.today 19 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. My parents had me snipped. When I asked why it was basically "well everyone was doing it."

My son is intact and can make his own decision about it when he's older.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Plural mutilations

Synonyms of mutilation

1

: an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilation

Circumcision is literally a textbook example of the word multilation

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 weeks ago

So, would you then describe all forms of surgery as "mutilation"? Or tattoos? Pierced ears? Hair cuts? They all fit the definition, as long as you see them as "harmful" or "destructive".

What makes the term derogatory is its inherently negative context. Applying it to hundreds of millions of people, is equally harmful and negative. That's what makes it a form of bigotry. You are making a broadly generalized, inherently negative assertion about an entire demographic.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What makes a difference is this is the non-consensual removal of a piece of the penis that has something like 30% of the total nerve endings in your entire dick, from an infant. It's not okay to pierce baby's ears either, or give them tattoos moron.

Adults can mutilate their dicks all they want. I'm completely in favor of 100% body autonomy for adults.

You support mutilating babies. Not too long ago, it was generally acceptable to rape kids as well, and that is horrific to think about for most of us now. None consensual baby circumcision will be just as disgusting and barbaric in the future, I'm sure of it.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Here we go with the rampant misinformation. Always relying on bullshit to make a point that doesn't exist.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Was and in cities like Atlanta and London its still considered acceptable to rape children. How dare you criticize the practice.

It's a tradition!

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

You don't have a moral leg to stand on; just surface reactionary parodies of anticolonial thought. You're on the Canadian server so I'm gonna assume this isn't personal. You aren't displaying a concrete knowledge of this culture, so I'm going to assume this isn't personal. And of course: that culture's not gonna fuck you.

You can stop.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Tattoos? Yes

Pierced ears? Yes

Hair cuts? No

HTH

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think "healthy" describes the loss of sensitivity, slight deformity, scars, and unease I have about mine. And mine was done for medical reasons when there were other alternatives. Mutilation does feel more accurate.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
217 points (99.5% liked)

World News

1237 readers
585 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS