180

Mullvad Browser (no TOR, no VPN) (monero.town)

submitted 1 year ago by Wave@monero.town to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Mullvad Browser is a privacy-focused web browser developed in collaboration with Mullvad VPN and the Tor Project. It aims to eliminate data collection and provide user-centric browsing services, ensuring online activity remains private and secure. The browser has the same fingerprinting protection as the Tor Browser, but connects to the internet without Tor Network or VPN instead. The Mullvad Browser provides anti-fingerprinting protections.

The idea is to provide one more alternative – beside the Tor Network – to browse the internet with more privacy. To get as many people as possible to fight the big data gathering of today. To free the internet from mass surveillance.

Here: >> mullvad browser official <<

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you think this is a good Browser, keep in mind:

this is a fork of Firefox with slower updates
its simply hardened Firefox desktop. Mobile needs a seperate app, but for Desktop all you need is a user.js
~~its not isolated from the system~~ it has a Flatpak, which is good. But check its default permissions
I think it doesnt use a fake Download, Desktop etc. path

Tor Browser Launcher Flatpak is the most secure Browser afaik.

For Firefox hardening, I made "Arkenfox softening"

Its an approach to download Arkenfox, change it to be usable as a normal browser without leaking more data in any way and automating that process.

Its best to use upstream Firefox, best as Flatpak (prove me wrong) and harden it using this well tested preset.

Its just a little crazy, thats why I read all of it and just change some settings, not reinvent the wheel

[-] sonalder@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

FlatPak is not the as secure as everyone think it is.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I would be happy to find some sources comparing bubblewrap with native Firefox or Chromium sandbox. Because the Torbrowser flatpak is nearly completely isolated

[-] sonalder@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I don't have that comparison but here are some resources that critics FlatPak's misleading security

https://hanako.codeberg.page/

https://flatkill.org/

https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2021/11/26/the-issue-with-flatpaks-permissions-model/

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Okay nothing new, nothing about the actual bubblewrap sandbox afais.

Yes they often have bad permissions, but thats because otherwise they would break.

The process is converting standard apps to Flatpaks, by actually implementing PORTALS. Portals are a special file manager that can open files outside the sandbox and symlink it to the flatpaks internal storage. So you can grant access only to needed files.

load more comments (3 replies)

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023

180 points (95.5% liked)

Privacy

31885 readers

433 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS