234
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
234 points (98.8% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
66210 readers
311 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !soulseek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is the fediverse you don't need to be cryptic about it
https://annas-archive.li/
s/org/li isn't being cryptic. That's a common way to write "substitute org with li"
Well, common in certain circles. Definitely cryptic for everybody else, though.
A "common way"? It's sed syntax. Non-technical people will not get it.
I am technical and it was not clicking
Ed is the standard editor
https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.en.html
.
I had no idea what the fuck they were talking about. Thank you.
Common within a very small niche. I got it, but still assumed you were trying to circumvent some kind of censorship
Aye. Bookmarking this thread to remind people when I see complaints Lemmy isn't taking off enough except for super technical topics.
I'd wager a lot of people from that small niche are registered on the Fediverse, though.
I use that syntax during work and still needed a hint to mentally parse the comment this way
well, especially since se also works as a domain, so I originally was expecting, to use related syntax for fun se|li (or plain old se/li) and had to go back and reread. At first read it as se/org/li as in, "se OR org OR li" work and I thought, "no, they just said org doesn't work." Then I reread and recognized the sed pattern.
Yeah, press x to doubt
I used these expressions too and when you see them, you know what it is
I'm just having problems switching contexts.
When I'm working on some code or whatever this Syntax comes naturally in vim, but I was thinking in non-sw-dev context and thought those are a list of substitutes and got majorly confused until I saw the next comments
Sometimes the mind is just in another place
Not sure what's so hard to believe about that
TIL 😅
...now guess what it means if a patient is S.O.B.
At least use
|for theORstatement.