89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago

What's so special about that? It's basically just googling, but it takes a second instead of an hour. With the added downside that you don't learn a thing, so you'll never be able to do it without AI.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

whether you learn something new or not it's up to you, not the ai

likewise, you can copy and paste from SO and learn nothing

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

exactly. ppl are like "AI can't teach you anything" and i'm like "well if you make zero effort to learn, you won't learn from humans either"

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago

See, a teacher will give you a task to solve, preferably on your own, to teach you a thing. They won't give you a task and the solution so you can look at the solution and go "ah, yes, I understand".

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 0 points 5 days ago

A good teacher will do that. And even the best teacher can’t force you to learn if you don’t want to. LLMs can be a powerful tool for learning if you’re sufficiently motivated.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

We're obviously talking about ideal situations because it is impossible in a normal conversation to acknowledge every single aberration. Regardless, if you learn by looking at the solution and going "i understand", you're doing yourself a disservice.

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

are you aware that there is more than one way to learn something

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 5 days ago

Sure. Most people learn best using variations on task solving.

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

"claude, what is 'using variations on task solving'"

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago
[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

actually the last time i talked to claude was the day i was committed to the psych ward. i was just fucking with it, but i fucked with it a little too hard, and it refused to respond to me because it said i was dangerously insane

so if you want the AI to shut the fuck up for a little while, that's what you do

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Cool, thanks for the advice. I find just not using it works fine. Also seems to help with staying on topic in a conversation and not shoving my medical history into everything.

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

look at what you made me do, you made me dig through your controversial comments to find one where you shoved your medical history into everything.

"I have ADHD and probably also the 'tism and I’ve never felt like hurting others or myself after eating sauce that happened to be red because it contained red ingredients. After eating anything, really, for that matter.

"

-you

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Do you think that might be because it made sense in the context? Because it was relevant to the topic?

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago
[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

Alright, I can see you're not actually interested in the conversation we were having.

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

i'm replying from my inbox so i have no idea what we were originally talking about, lmaoooo

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

maybe next time project less?

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

here’s a trick: treat the ai like a rubber duck. dig deeper with places like devdocs.io and you find you’ll be learning …

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

you don't learn a thing

are you aware that you can use the AI to explain the code it wrote for you?

[-] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

The comment suggests that that is not the case here.

[-] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Except you are not getting an explanation. Sheesh, do we really need to go all over the "token prediction machine is unable to understand" iteration, again?

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

except you ARE getting an explanation. it doesn't matter that the AI doesn't know what it's doing. do YOU know what you're doing? do you have any idea how your brain puts words together to form phrases and sentences? of course you don't

[-] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Lol. Once again: I am not getting an explanation, see hallucinated functions and packages (that never happened, right?)

I know what I am doing, which is exactly why I get paid for my code.

And we know a lot more about how we think than you imagine, lol. Like, humans do not think in words. But you did not know that, did you?

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

based on your complaints about LLMs, it sounds like you've just convinced yourself that anything you code is better than what an LLM would do. you sound like a major narcissist, and i'm going to run my mental health diagnosis bot on your publicly available comment history.

[-] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

So you have no evidence or anything else of substance to prove that your statements are true. Have a good day

[-] NEILSON_MANDALA@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

i'm replying from my inbox so i don't kn ow what you're talking about

[-] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

About sums it up:)

[-] TevTra@lemmy.tevtra.com 0 points 4 days ago

Don't bother, it's like the flat earthers all over again.

this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
89 points (74.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

28398 readers
1020 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS