248
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 63 points 5 days ago

It's absolutely wild that I've seen 2 other struggle sessions over the past few days where people keep insisting he was run over or executed when presented with evidence to the contrary.

https://hexbear.net/comment/6791928

https://old.reddit.com/r/TrueAnon/comments/1q925hu/why_does_western_media_never_show_the_full_tank/nysnaeu/?context=3

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 days ago

We were taught in school that the video ended with the guy standing there and that no other footage made it out of the evil dictatorship.

I only more recently learned the video goes on for some time

[-] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago

I just read some of the comments in the first thread you linked and whew. It’s just thoughtless lib regurgitation countered by pages of material analysis which elicit no response or the most milquetoast “interesting!” from people who will clearly never click a single resource linked

All I can say is, infinite flowers for the comrades posting on the frontlines of the war on brainworms

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago

This particular exchange will live in my head rent free forever.

Presents basic argument

Receives basic response justified by very simple theory

Goes on rant about how the concept of even having political theory at all is bad and limits your perspective

Academics hate this one simple trick to never having to read anything: have you considered that thinking about things ahead of time and writing down your observations is tyranny?

[-] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago

Why do these people always have the same insufferable tone of “I refuse to engage with your arguments, not because I don’t understand them or don’t have anything meaningful to respond with, but because I am at a higher level of evolution than you simpletons. Having no opinions is the ultimate proof of intellectual rigour” grhshahhshd

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago

They even ask rhetorical questions as if to suggest a specific argument that they don't want to make outright, but then never have the courtesy to type out the argument they wanted to make once their questions are answered. Like, they asked "So China and Russia aren't authoritarianisms? [sic]" implying that they do think China and Russia are authoritarian, but when faced with a counterargument they don't try to explain why the thing they believe stands up against that counterargument and make the implicit thing from the question explicit; instead they just start mocking the interlocutor without offering any response or counterargument. So exhausting and annoying.

[-] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago

I’m pretty convinced that most of the worst internet behaviour is linked to poor dopamine regulation. They just want that sweet hit of satisfaction from the “gotcha” moment, the feeling of “winning” without having to expend any effort. When it’s called out they have nowhere to go other than trying to “win” again with a more extreme/absurd “gotcha”.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago

Yeah that's definitely consistent with the behavior shown on this thread. People deploy arguments that I can't imagine are actually supposed to be persuasive because they have absolutely 0 convincing content behind them. It feels almost as if they're only doing it for the performance of arguing, not for the prospect of arriving at a better understanding of something or convincing someone else.

[-] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago

Debatebro culture has a lot to answer for. And twitter, for that matter. Before that at least most political arguments online were somewhat long-form in my experience. (I grew up on the Gaiaonline “Extended Discussion” boards lmao.) Now it’s all about trying to shut it down as definitively as possible within an arbitrarily small character limit. Hexbear is genuinely the only place I see anyone engaging in lengthy discussion nowadays

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

Because they think intelligence and being a "good person" are inherent traits that they are born with, and the NPCs on the internet forum they are arguing with are just bad guys who need to be "beaten". They don't examine their own position and consider it because they don't have a position, they are just inherently correct.

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

rofl.. perfect libbrained response.. I, a man of culture, do not subscribe to any particular viewpoint at any given time as that would limit my mental gymnastics

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
248 points (97.3% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14237 readers
867 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS