771
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
771 points (98.6% liked)
News
35895 readers
703 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Man is lucky he wasn't executed.
Has to be war time for that, right?
The Rosenbergs were executed in peacetimes.
Edit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_the_United_States_military
SSG Biggs isn’t eligible for UCMJ under current precedent. He has not served enough time, was medically discharged, and is not eligible for retirement benefits to my knowledge.
https://www.tullylegal.com/resources/articles/can-you-be-charged-under-the-ucmj-after-discharge/
I had thought the person I replied to was referencing treason in the constitution but I may be wrong about war/peace about that.
Could he not be executed as a civilian like the Rosenbergs?
They were tried for espionage. I haven’t been closely following Biggs, but I don’t believe he has this charge
He doesn't fit element A, so this whole discussion is moot. Please stop spreading misinformation. Also, if you're gonna cite the UCMJ, cite the corresponding statute number (Article 94). Also, it helps if you spell UCMJ correctly
JCUM
Why does he not fit element A? Is it 1 or 2 or 3 or 4; or do you have to fulfill 1-4 to qualify? I don’t know the context behind the excerpt they posted
That's the problem; they didn't post the context that would demonstrate he is not subject to the UCMJ as a veteran. Some retirees may be subject to the UCMJ, but in general, the UCMJ applies to active duty military. I'm a veteran with legal experience, not a lawyer, so I'm willing to be corrected with facts from someone who knows and isn't just repeating bullshit they heard on social media.
The elements of this crime have several different acts which qualify; you don't have to do all of them to be guilty. The preface (which was cut off) denotes which people are subject to punishment under this law, which would almost certainly NOT include Biggs.
I think I found context:
SSG Biggs served from 2007-2012: https://www.news-journalonline.com/story/news/2023/04/19/joe-biggs-volusia-proud-boys-leader-will-not-testify-at-his-trial/70126430007/
UCMJ is for (active) service members: https://www.bileckilawgroup.com/court-martial-defense/articles-of-the-ucmj/article-94-mutiny-and-sedition/#:~:text=Sedition%20under%20Article%2094%20of%20the%20UCMJ%20occurs%20when%20a,of%20that%20lawful%20civil%20authority.
SSG Biggs does not meet the general retired conditions for UCMJ punishment: https://www.tullylegal.com/resources/articles/can-you-be-charged-under-the-ucmj-after-discharge/
The only piece to this puzzle I didn't have is in your first link.
Cool, so he didn't have 20 years AND he isn't retired; he was medically discharged. These two factors absolutely remove him from consideration of punishment under the UCMJ. Nice detective work there!
You should take the "(Ret.)" out behind his name so as not to mislead though.