11
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

My favorite part is where they continue to argue with my banned ass, knowing full well I can't respond. The only way to win for them, I suppose.

Edit: Looks like there was some confusion regarding cross-posting in the original link so I'll just put the Modlog link here that displays the removed comment and ban, with the thread itself linked here. I'd rather add than change for the sake of the post's integrity and preventing confusion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I notice you prefered to avoid answering my question about foreign leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals, intellectuals who openly admired Hitler and Mussolini. Instead you brought up the double genocide, which wasn't relevant to my question.

Why do you think it is that you'd rather not answer a question about leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals and the countries that support them?

What would you think if someone tried to change the topic when you asked them a question related to polticians quoting fascist intellectuals?

Where would you think their political affiliations lie?

[-] LeninWeave@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

https://lemmy.ml/post/41654379/23321470

Here's a link to my reply to you from 30 minutes ago which addresses every point you bring up here. I'll copy the relevant parts below.

I notice you prefered to avoid answering my question about foreign leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals, intellectuals who openly admired Hitler and Mussolini.

Why do you think it is that you’d rather not answer a question about leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals and the countries that support them?

What would you think if someone tried to change the topic when you asked them a question related to polticians quoting fascist intellectuals?

Even if we accept whatever you’re trying to say here completely at face value, is your stance that someone who says “this specific claim about China is not supported by credible evidence” has to then answer for every single thing any leader in any country ever supported in any way by China has said?

Instead you brought up the double genocide, which wasn’t relevant to my question.

What would you think of someone who said there was no evidence of a genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza?

Yes, you're correct that if there was an overwhelming amount of credible evidence from an almost uncountable number of sources (including the people committing genocide bragging about it) it would be different.

There's no equivalence there. Treating these two things as equivalent minimizes (possibly even rises to the level of denying) the actual genocide.

[-] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

I notice you prefered to avoid answering my question about foreign leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals, intellectuals who openly admired Hitler and Mussolini. Instead you brought up the double genocide, which wasn't relevant to my question.

Let's see if that's true. What were you referring to with leaders who quote fascist intellectuals, because my point in referencing double genocide was the "Red Fash" trope that libs refer to often, but there may have been a misunderstanding.

What would you think if someone tried to change the topic when you asked them a question related to polticians quoting fascist intellectuals?

You seem to have found this an intriguing point to hone in on, willingly ignoring the rest of the points I and others had mentioned as well. If we're making such inferences, what does that infer about you?

[-] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

What do you think it infers about me?

[-] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

That you're intellectually dishonest, a real dialog with you isn't possible, and I'd have a more coherent conversation with a dog, thus this conversation is now over.

[-] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You are indeed correct that a real dialog isn't possible with people who are intellectually dishonest to others and themselves.

Especially when it comes to certain world leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago
[-] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Lol sorry China isn't meeting your personal moral standards, maybe you should send them a strongly worded letter about it

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
11 points (59.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1513 readers
159 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS