They shouldn’t be willing to be follow someone actively and blatently committing treason.
He's really not doing anything out of the ordinary for the American Empire, unfortunately.
They shouldn’t be willing to be follow someone actively and blatently committing treason.
He's really not doing anything out of the ordinary for the American Empire, unfortunately.
Surely no "leftist" is going to get incredibly mad about this good post in the comments.
It takes a lot of restraint to not just respond with "hell yeah I support the white genocide", but I don't want to read a thousand "see, you're genocidal" smug replies from people who think white genocide is real.
I didn't even catch that TBH, but the implication that social democrats somehow AREN'T liberals is funny.
choose hindenburg in 1932
get hitler in 1933 anyway
historians are still trying to figure out how this happened /s
I’m also aware of what would’ve happened if Hitler as elected instead.
Literally exactly the same thing?
are you aware of what happened when hindenburg was elected
By that logic, Hindenburg was "better" than Hitler, but choosing one still got you the other in the end.
Genuinely asking: what do you mean by this? 
Sometimes so much that I want to ask him this.

If they wanted to live, they shouldn't have signed up to kill people for the empire. Instead of following orders, they can refuse them. Yankee nationalists cry about it in the comments.