95
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

Time for all those 2A, Castle Doctrine, "tally-ho lads!" types to start defending their homes, right?

........right?

[-] shittydwarf@piefed.social 14 points 4 months ago

The tyranny that they were always talking about has finally arrived so surely any moment now

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

Except all those castle doctrine types are the ones in the ICE gear.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago

For this particular instance can I interest you in some Rolf?

[-] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I can hear this image

[-] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 7 points 4 months ago
[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Just as the Founding Fathers intended.

[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Sitting on Lemmy waiting for some 338LM brass to dry in the oven then I'm back to the press to fill and seat everything. Have been putting off loading for my precision rig but recent events have introduced some new urgency to that task.

[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I hear ya. All of a sudden projects that have been "some day" turned into "right the hell now".

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I can't, my state has made it nearly impossible for the average citizen to purchase a firearm and there's now a poll tax I mean racist tax I mean background check fee... Because there's already a federal background check but now my state patrol does the exact same background check using the exact same database but it takes them weeks longer to process and I still have to pay for it. Anyways probably easier for some fascist to roll in and just take my stuff the way the founding fathers intended.

Oh and anything with a threaded barrel is banned too so I hope my family is prepared to go deaf if I ever get around to purchasing that firearm.

[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Let me introduce you to black powder. Protecting your rights since we kicked it all off on April 19, 1775.

Plus, nowadays you can get a drop-in conversion cylinder to go from powder to modern cartridges without an FFL.

It's in their interest to make exercising your rights difficult. Don't let them.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Actually, yes.

I am completely against violent protests. Take a look at my post history; it's real. Letting protests turn violent is a great way to give even more power to the fascists.

But jesus fucking christ, if they're fool enough to take their goddamn goon show on the road and start banging on doors, whatever happens next is on them.

Or to put it another way, for fascists hell bent on racial purity that's one unironic way to chlorinate the piss out of the gene pool, I suppose.

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago
[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Are you unable to articulate your own thoughts? It can't be that compelling if you can't even bring it yourself. Look at you so intellectually helpless you have to fling someone else's social media at me, like the whole chunk, as though you can't figure it out.

If you can, point to the place on the image that is your direct answer to my comment, otherwise it's just regurge.

Be sure to include how Charlottesville (Trump's favorite, where they killed Heather Heyer) was a grand success, and Minneapolis a few years ago (George Floyd) and Portland, etc. Give examples of recent violent protests in the US that have been grand examples of your premise, because we've had them, and they are simply not remembered except as the own-goals they are. Or maybe you're a J-6 fan? Not sure, couldn't tell from what you didn't write, lol.

You're just a secondhand larper using someone else's words to provoke other people to fight.

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 0 points 4 months ago

Next time you wanna tell me you're a bootlicker, don't throw paragraphs at me. One sentence will be enough.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Aw, you wrote it yourself. I'm proud of you. Yet still no credible defense of violent protest in your own words, just an ad hominem attack because you possess nothing else.

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29872 readers
513 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS