14

Most servers around the world run Linux. The same goes for almost all supercomputers. That's astonishing in a capitalist world where absolutely everything is commodified. Why can't these big tech companies manage to sell their own software to server operators or supercomputers? Why is an open, free project that is free for users so superior here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

A big piece is licensing. When you're throwing hundreds or thousands of processor cores into a data center, somewhere a Microsoft VAR is just drooling to sell you datacenter license packs that you'll need to renew/repurchase for every major OS upgrade. Ah, and you'll need device/user cals. Oh you want to manage it too? Oof.

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Just to really drive this point home, if I go and price out a dell R470 with the default config from dell.ca it's $9700. If i want a windows server license, that's another $4700 on top of that.

Why pay 50% more for software that is slower and harder to support? That's not even thinking about SQL server licensing which is even more expensive.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Almost anyone buying servers already has Microsoft enterprise agreement licenses, which are much cheaper than that retail price.

[-] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

This is true, but as I recall the minimum users you need to get an enterprise agreement license is ~500 users. So you're already talking over 6 figures to have the option to buy cheaper server OS licenses.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe I'm misremembering the name, it's been a while. I remember the minimum volume license purchase was five licenses, but you could buy one Windows server license at whatever price, and four $5 whatever licenses.

[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Almost anyone buying servers already has Microsoft enterprise agreement licenses, which are much cheaper than that retail price.

Right. But Linux is.... checks notes... free.

Edit: Just because y'all want to pay for support does not make Linux any less free.

[-] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Enterprise Linux however is not. The majority of places won't buy anything without support. Which is why I sell a lot of Red Hat.

[-] Pistcow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I worked for a mid size distribution center and just the licensing fees for all types of software for about 500 workers was $100k a month. Just basic warehouse management, erp, Microsoft, etc. Let alone data center licensing.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
14 points (93.8% liked)

Linux

14837 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS