Image is of a harbor in Tasiilak, Greenland.
NATO infighting? You love to see it, folks.
The latest incident of America's satrapies becoming increasingly unhappy about their mandated kowtowing involves, of all places, Greenland. As I'm sure most people here are aware, Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark with a degree of geopolitical and economic importance - the former due to its proximity to Russia, and the latter due to the proven and potential reserves of minerals that could be mined there. It's also been an odd fascination of Trump during his reign, now culminating in outright demands.
Trump has called for negotiations with Denmark to purchase Greenland, justifying this by stating that it would be safer from Russia and China under America's protection. Apparently, Norway's decision to not give him the Nobel Peace Prize further inflamed him (not that the Norweigan government decides who receives the prizes). He has also said that countries that do not allow him to make the decision - which not only includes Denmark, but also other European countries - will suffer increased tariffs by June, and that he has not ruled out a military solution.
This threat has led to much internal bickering inside the West, with European leaders stating they will not give in to Trump's demands, and even sending small numbers of troops to Greenland. The most bizarre part of this whole affair is that the US already basically has total military access and control over Greenland anyway, and has since the 1950s, when they signed an agreement with Denmark. There are already several US military facilities on Greenland, and B-52 bombers have famously flown in the vicinity of the island (and crashed into it with nuclear bombs in tow, in fact). Therefore, this whole event - in line with his all-performance, little-results presidency so far - seems to be largely about the theatrics of forcing the Europeans to continue to submit to his whims. I would not be surprised if they ultimately do sign a very imbalanced deal, though - the current European leadership is bound too tightly to the US to put up even half-hearted resistance.
This is all simultaneously occurring alongside the Canadian Prime Minister's visit to China in which longstanding sore spots in their bilateral relationship are being addressed, with China reducing tariffs on Canadian canola oilseeds, and Canada reducing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, as well as currency swaps between their central banks, among many other things. It seems no accident that Canada's reconsideration of their relationship with China is occurring as Trump has made remarks about turning Canada into the next US state, as well as the demand for the renegotiation of the USMCA.
Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
https://kalikoba.substack.com/p/china-waiting-and-losing
tfw in emerging multipolar world second pole doesn't want to be a pole, and we get back into monopolar empire
I think the author is trying to project China into becoming a new USSR, which China is not and will not. To be fair, I also pinned my hopes on China stepping up when the Ukraine war started, but over the years, it’s clear that this is not going to be the case.
So, in this sense, China is not waiting nor is it losing. In fact, I think China’s been playing its cards very competently against Trump’s trade war aggressions. There is only disappointment if one thinks this will lead to a new global order that will benefit the Global South. The opposite is happening, with China dumping its surplus industrial goods on the other countries, especially the EU, forcing them into running worsening trade deficits to protect China’s own domestic export industries.
In other words, China is exporting unemployment in a world where there is a surplus of productive capacity while the global demand for consumption is dwindling.
Furthermore, China standing up against the US would mean their trillions and trillions of accumulated US dollars would be turned worthless. Despite frantic purchase of gold, it still only constitutes a tiny fraction of China’s vast foreign reserves. The ruling class and the bourgeois elites would not want to see their wealth evaporates, so even the most revolutionary leaders would still have to confront heavy obstacles when trying to touch the elites’ interests.
This may seem like a contradiction but it is by design - the US de-industrializes itself and runs a perpetual trade deficit, while you get all the benefits of industrialization and GDP, yet you will find yourself entrenched so deeply into the system we designed that getting out of the rut becomes increasingly difficult by the day.
The only way out, as I have always pointed out, is for China to abandon the neoliberal ideology, a system that it has greatly benefited from for at least 30 years. And to be clear, China isn’t the only one playing this game. Before that, South Korea and Taiwan were the winners who took advantage of the early GATT (now known as WTO) arrangements to benefit from running trade surplus, and before them, Japan in the 1960s (under the Bretton Woods era).
Everyone is playing this neoliberal game, hoping that they too, can one day be a winner like China, South Korea, Japan etc. This is why Trump’s global tariffs, while seem like nightmares for some, also presented (the illusion of) opportunities for others. Everyone is secretly hoping that Trump would break up an entrenched system where upward mobility has now become stifled for most low/middle income developing countries, that somehow, with the ongoing US-China trade war, they could exploit the opening to become the next rising exporter country. Meanwhile, China’s maneuvers are all about preventing exactly that from happening, so the US will continue to rely on China.
That’s the true logic behind Trump’s trade war. It keeps the Global South disorganized and in competition with one another, while the US reaps and extracts from their bickering. Behind this is the “promise” of a collapsing order and where one can climb that ladder under chaos, only to fall into the designs of the imperialists. Laugh at the European vassals all you want, but at least they have class solidarity and understand well enough some of them will have to sacrifice themselves to preserve the system for the bourgeoisie to keep the treats flowing, like worker drones sacrificing for the queen to protect the colony under distress.
TL;DR: The fall of the USSR and its consequences. There is no international solidarity anymore.
Thank you for the write up comrade. With the sudden welcoming of the IMF into their own country, unless they have a bait and switch strategy of sorts, it's a disappointing embrace of neoliberalism. Idk why some people are still surprised China isn't acting like a new USSR, even if it would be nice to have a communist power like that around, when that's clearly not the strategy they have.
Just a minor correction, the recent development of IMF Shanghai Center isn’t sudden welcoming, and IMF has been in China for a long time, but the further integration of the Chinese monetary system into the IMF framework, with the IMF now recognizing China’s role as an economic powerhouse in the region and in the world.
China will continue to play a major role in the global economy in the years to come, but I don’t see them abandoning the IMF neoliberal framework anytime soon.
Oh, noted. Shanghai leadership seems to be the most liberal part of the cpc iirc so not surprised it's there.