38
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
38 points (97.5% liked)
Asklemmy
52475 readers
279 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
This is a different situation because we're not making demands of our respective employers but of the federal government. I'm not sure what the right answer is.
If not even your direct employer is aware of a strike that presumably affects them, how the hell would a government five, ten layers removed be able to tell?
Not going to tell you not to take your sick day. I take sick days too...
You can have a phenomenon that looks like noise at small sample sizes, but becomes obvious when the size increases.
For one small business, a 5% change in productivity for one day might be business as usual, while for a nation it would be alarming.
Additionally, now that these people aren't working, they can go and protest, the other part of a typical strike. That's what actually gets eyeballs on the issue. It was national news that Minnesota just did one.
Honestly, this question is on my mind as well.