91
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
91 points (93.3% liked)
Asklemmy
52774 readers
333 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Got proof? Because I'm pretty sure military contractors have to explain themselves to senators and congresspeople that got them the contract if toxic waste leaks out of a "secure" facility.
Datacenters on the other hand are corporations using their own money/investments to grab land, congress/senators didn't ask them to.
the pentagon hasn't passed an audit in its entire history.
like nuclear waste
And then they have to pay a 10 million fine, but discharging toxic waste saves them 100 million. Very accountable.
Where is this 10 million fine story? I can't find it.