41
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by RetroHax@feddit.org to c/steam@lemmy.ml

As an Anti DRM Gamer who really does not buy Games featuring Boot/RootKit i wonder if itd be possible to consider somehow a Ban against Denuvo, VM Protect and all these other Bullshit DRMs that go into your System and arent just tied to some kind of Online Service like the Steam Store for Example >.>
Would that even be feasable in the EU considering that we got osme Stricter Laws than lets say the US regarding Multi Media Content :P

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How is banning Denuvo working?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

LOL no that's MY point. Neither of them are working because no one is doing either of them.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

people are definetly "voting with their wallets", myself included

as always with stuff like that, only a minority cares, so a solution must be workable by a minority who does.

so if the solution for the problem is "if only people just..." then it's not effective.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

No they aren't. If they were, it would be working.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

they are, that's precisely my point.

it's just that it doesn't work and expecting it to is a waste of time.

we'd need another strategy.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

They aren't. That's precisely my point.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

they are. that's just how ineffective it is.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It is 100% effective. The fact that it's not working indicates that they're not doing it. They're not going to keep doing this without a viable path to profitability.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

we need a new strategy to fix this sort of thing, my dude.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Indeed. What would you suggest?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

if i had that answer you'd probably be seeing me as some kind of leadership on it.

though legislative pressure is a good place to start, my country is currently in the process of banning lootbox type stuff, and some of the data collection in games.

not perfect but definitely a step up from the free market "the consumers decide" crap that isn't actually yielding any results.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

definitely a step up from the free market "the consumers decide" crap that isn't actually yielding any results.

😂 In what way? Getting govts to crack down on it hasn't solved anything either. If you're ever able to actually get anything passed, the companies just play this stupid game of malicious compliance and then the govts call it a day and move on.

The "free market crap" doesn't work if enough people don't pitch in. Look how quickly we solved the Jimmy Kimmel situation by voting with our wallets. Less than a week. Can you even fathom a govt that efficient?

You seem to be presenting a false dichotomy. You don't have to choose. You can do both. But voting with your wallet is the fastest, most effective, and most permanent, when actually implemented.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Getting govts to crack down on it hasn’t solved anything either.

i just exemplified a small win to you that happened close to me.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

And then right after that I explain how that solved nothing because they just poked holes in the legislation.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
41 points (93.6% liked)

Steam

16007 readers
84 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS