29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hoimo@ani.social 8 points 2 days ago

There's a lot of numbers in that article, but the most important number is missing: how common is it in the UK to have closely related parents? The only number mentioned is the 1 in 6 in Bradford, which is unbelievably high, but would mean that "1 in 14 of deceased children have consanguinous parents" is actually lower than expected.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anacdotal experience only. But I'd suggest it's way more common then folks know.

More so from the 1970s and before. And in rural areas of the UK. But that is more to do with options and how they spread post 1967 law changes. (Pill and abortion both legalized. Though pill only for married women at that time). But for younger readers. Both were often hard to obtain for young adult women in rural areas until the mid 80s.

As a teen My GPs lived in a farming village. And would hint at it when I visited and got to know a few local girls. I did not think much of it at the time.

Post Uni I lived with them for a few months. And got to know one of these girls way better. To the point she felt the need to explain why she never wanted children.

Apparently she knew a few others in the village were in the same situation. For timing this was mid 90s we were both in our mid 20s at the time. So he mother likely finished school in the late 60s. And I know sex education in schools was very hit and miss due to political attitudes at the time. With city schools being more comfortable then rural. Late 60s was when the pill was legalised and labour were pushing all schools to add sex ed classes. So many parents objected.

But news over the last 30+ years. Would lead me to recognise while Insest is no less common. Pro Choice really matters for more reasons then most would expect.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I used to work in this field, and we would do pedigree analysis a lot on families, usually with some kind of disease.

Anyway, we would construct the family tree, plug it into the stats software and it would tell us: "No. These two people are not cousins, but something closer."

We couldn't ask the families, so we would swap a grandfather for a father, or a mother for a sister, and - hey presto - everything lines up.

This happened in about 1 in 10 families we studied. This type of thing is way waaay more common than people think.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thanks for sharing. Nice to have less anacdotal evidence.

Well nice is not the right word. But I'm sure you know what I mean,

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Usually don't have to look too far to start seeing the skeletons :P

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6508 readers
455 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS