472
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago

There are several legit reasons why you'd do this. Unit tests, for example: override getRandom() with an implementation that always returns the same series of numbers, and now you have repeatable tests without touching the production code.

[-] WhiteRice@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can you override Math.random within a local scope?

At my shop we do create generic covers for vendor specific functionality, for the reasons you stated. Though the practice was started in case we ever needed to swap vendors.

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago

You can, but you shouldn’t. You don’t know what else relies on Math.random. That’s why there’s the wrapper function. That you can override in unit tests without worrying about other, unrelated code.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
472 points (99.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

29813 readers
1067 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS