760
Our apologies, sir. Of course, sir.
(media.piefed.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
760 points (99.6% liked)
People Twitter
9594 readers
774 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think we're arguing over strawmen. You seem to think one should not mention it if they get the wrong drink order, regardless of how politely they bring it up. I think it's ok to do so, provided it's done politely. I'm not trying to argue that point, mostly just offering my opinion. I'm not suggesting the customer is always right, just that it's possible for staff to be wrong and it's not improper to ask them to fix a mistake. I understand that in the OP the guy is wrong, but that doesn't mean everyone should just take what they are given and be happy with it regardless.
I'm may be a dirty commie, but I think capitalism has really messed up the way people perceive people on the other side of exchanges. Baristas are often overworked and underpaid but that's not the fault of the customers who are often also overworked and underpaid. If someone decides to spend some of their limited resources on a treat for themselves then I think it's ok that they make sure to get the thing they asked and paid for. I am personally boycotting a lot of big brands, but I'm sure local places are also taking advantage of their workers, there's just no big campaign against them. There's no ethical consumption under capitalism etc etc, but we all participate in the economy and should care about how others are treated. If I do something wrong I want to fix it because I care about you and your experience. What you want matters to me and you should get it. You should also care if that affects me and my day and should try to minimize the stress by being polite and understanding. That's my overall thought process.
The guy is saying people should know what they are asking for.
If you think your order is wrong, you should be able to say something. What does "handed the order you placed" mean in this context? Yea, "people should know what they're asking for", but places do things differently. You should be able to ask. If the answer is "that's how we do it here" sure, just accept it, but unless you're allowed to ask there is no way to know the difference.
By the way, the problem you refer to below is likely the XY problem which is not what is happening here. It's also not a strawman argument as the other person suggests. I think you should be able to ask a question about your order. Somehow the other commenter thinks you should know in advance the answer to your question and decide to ask based on the answer. I don't know why they take issue with asking but there is no way to know if "you got handed the order you placed" while you are unsure about it for whatever reason.
Ok well he said thanks, so if you think my interpretation of what he said is wrong you aren't the one that decides that
I'm not saying your interpretation is wrong. I'm just saying that if you can't ask a clarifying question then there's no way to know if you got what you asked for.
Idk man, how do you interpret this as "not being able to ask a question"
If you are handed something you think is wrong, but it has your order number/name on it, I think it's ok to ask "hey is this the X" and they can say, "yes this is how we make X" or "oh it looks like the wrong thing was made/looks like this was someone else's order". You shouldn't just shut up if you think it's wrong even if it is handed to you.
"if you got handed the order you placed" not their problem if you call apples oranges, if you say orange you aren't getting an apple.
If you order an orange and are handed a blood orange it should be ok to say "hey is this an orange?" And they can say "yes, it's a blood orange". It's technically what you asked for, but maybe you've never seen a blood orange before and it looks like a grapefruit to you. I think it's ok to have asked that even though you did not explicitly state you wanted a navel orange because though it's what you ordered it's not what you expected. Sometimes things look different than how you expect and it's ok to confirm that difference is normal. If you make a fuss about the kind of orange that's not ok, but asking to make sure you get the right thing is fine. In this scenario they have reason to believe the order is wrong even though technically they got what they ordered. The idea that you just know "if you got handed the order placed" is not correct. If you call and order a strawberry and vanilla cake but when you open the box for pickup the frosting is brown, it's ok to double check and ask if the flavor is vanilla. In that case you were given what you ordered but had a legitimate question about whether or not it was your order. Should you just take the cake when it's possible someone accidentally put a chocolate cake in this box and your cake in a chocolate cake box? I don't think so. You can simply ask and they can say "yes the frosting is brown but the flavor is vanilla and not chocolate". Why is that a problem? If you ordered the wrong thing it's on you, but they are saying just to shut up even "if you think it's wrong". That makes no sense to me. Just asking "hey is this right" should be fine. If they say yes then move on but asking shouldn't be a problem.
Again. Guy is talking about people who do not, "move on"
Thank you!
NP I run into this constantly at work. "I want this" ok, why do you want that? "It does this/because it's x/because that's our standard" but... No it doesn't/isn't/ain't.
Hahahaha you sound like a technical writer I know.
Huh, according to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man we're both making strawman arguments.