939
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe -3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Not sure why you're responding with that amount of hostility, I don't feel I did anything to warrant it?

Matrix's creation and development for the first 3 years was funded by Amdocs, as evidenced on the Matrix.org website itself:

How is Matrix[.]org funded? For the first three years of Matrix's development (2014-2017), most of the core contributors worked for Amdocs, who paid for them to work fulltime on Matrix. In July 2017, Amdocs considered the project to be sufficiently successful that it could now self-support and so stopped funding. The majority of the core team is now employed by Element, an independent company set up to hire the team and support Matrix's development. Other contributors are funded by their own employers or donate their own time to the project.

Amdocs is a telecom company that was founded in Israel, and later went on to run much of the US's telecom infrastructure. It has long been suspected to be involved in espionage for the Israeli government.

One of their revenue streams is providing their services to law enforcement, as they admit to here, which I'm not particularly comfortable with, personally.

So you’re confirming my point

When I say 10,000+, I mean it may not scale to encrypting that amount of people in a single room, not that the service itself cannot scale beyond that. Due to its distributed nature, it can avoid being bogged down by having many thousands of users, but if 10,000 people all tried to go into a single encrypted room where all those messages would have to be sent all at once, it would, I assume, bog down. That's an insanely unlikely situation to ever occur, as any public server that could grow to that size would not have encryption turned on anyway (and Discord itself, the thing we're trying to replace, doesn't have any encryption at all).

[-] RelativityRanger@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Because I know exactly who I'm dealing with here, that's gross misinformation.

Congrats you've found where it was founded, now it's an independent non-profit. What's wrong with you?
https://matrix.org/blog/2025/06/dispelling-myths

Then you're mixing out Element with Matrix, alleging they provide services to law enforcement. Not the same thing my friend, if you have a problem with Element, fine, then get another client. What's the problem?

You're just proving my point again on scalability, get off the keyboard lol

[-] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You're response amounts to "Okay, so what if it was created and funded by an Israeli company known for espionage? They spun it off into a non-profit, which somehow removes any connection between those two things now."

As to Element, they are, in their own words, made up of ex-Matrix Staff.

They're legally distinct entities if that matters to how much you trust that corporation to have our best interests in mind, but they're still from the same likely compromised institution.

If you like Matrix and find absolutely nothing concerning about the connections of the two most influential entities in that space, than by all means, carry on.

For myself, I'll stick with XMPP or Deltachat.

[-] RelativityRanger@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They spun it off into a non-profit, which somehow removes any connection between those two things now

Yes, by definition, but we can keep going.

[BIG PICTURE TO PROVE NOTHING]

You can't reject the Matrix Foundation because it's a non-profit. There is no credible evidence that Israel (government or intelligence agencies) funds or controls Matrix as a protocol.

If you like Matrix and find absolutely nothing concerning about the connections of the two most influential entities in that space, than by all means, carry on.

If you write a client that uses a protocol to communicate over the internet, you better stick to that protocol, no? I mean, think about it for a second? What's wrong with youuuu? lol

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
939 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

13841 readers
831 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS