48
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Emerald@lemmy.world to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

School speed limits are unnecessarily complicated. So many times I'll pass a school speed limit sign and sometimes it's just "while flashing" which is easy to understand quickly. However, other times it has in very small print conditions such as during certain times or during weekdays or even the really vague "when children present". Sometimes I won't notice all of the print before I pass the sign, so I'll just do the slower school speed limit and the driver behind me starts tailgaiting me because I'm going under the limit. So I suggest instead of having these limits be conditional school speed limits, they should just be the normal limits all the time. It wouldn't hurt people to slow down when kids aren't present, so just make the speed limit reduced all the time on roads around the school. Additionally, if this was the case, drivers would be used to going slow and wouldn't forget to slow down during school hours

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 33 points 1 week ago

Definitely an unpopular opinion, so I'll give you the vote.

That said, of you can't be bothered to slow down to read the sign where kids can be, maybe you aren't ready to drive.

[-] bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for your contribution

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I prefer this over "when school children are present".

Like I still don't know what that means. Is it during pickup/dropoff? Is it all day on school days? Is it only if I see a kid? Do they have school on certain holidays?

I guess I'd prefer a 'when flashing' light instead.

[-] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's not what OP is saying.

So I suggest instead of having these limits be conditional school speed limits, they should just be the normal limits all the time. It wouldn’t hurt people to slow down when kids aren’t present, so just make the speed limit reduced all the time on roads around the school.

They still want to slow down. That said you are correct that this means they wouldn't need to read the sign.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree, but in some states like where I live mow they have some weird school set ups. Speed limit is 55mph on the road if it isn't during school start/end. So while I think it'd be fine if people went 20 there all the time, there would likely be a lot of backlash from people saying 'i could to 60 there every day for the last 20 years on my way to and from work (it leads to a major interstate) and now you want me to go 20!

Honestly it is just a poor setup for the school. Should have built a road around the back where you directed all the traffic

[-] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You know, I was about to say that we should go back to no school zones like in the 80s since the speed limit was always just 30 around school zones anyway and people had to slow anyway when school let out because of all the traffic.

And I was wondering why school zones were created in the first place since there was no problem to fix. But now I remember that schools were once always in residential areas. But with school zones today, they can stick them on airport runways if they want to.

Yeah here it's like "how do we find 1000 kids and get them fastest to a place". (Not that I know how many kids they actually have now, my spouse said she had less than 100 in her graduating classes for elementary school, so that's not drop outs like in highschool).

Life is different everywhere. I saw a video of kids the traveling 2 hours of sketchy fall in bridges to get to a school in another country, and all I could think was, my father would say "all Hispanics are lazy, and no black parents know how to raise kids". Granted this is the same guy that went on a drunken rant about hating Jews back in ~2008.. but he was doing so well for awhile, actually voted for Obama once

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
48 points (88.7% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8824 readers
23 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS