250
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spectre@hexbear.net 43 points 3 months ago

They usually go for "disorderly conduct" (you had a feeling about the situation at hand) or "obstruction of justice" (you didn't let me do whatever I wanted) if they want to take someone away for bs reasons (even if the charges are dropped next week).

Technically trespassing requires a verbal warning at which time you're allowed to leave freely before they arrest you.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago

Technically trespassing requires a verbal warning at which time you're allowed to leave freely before they arrest you.

Somebody must've said "Stop talking," to the guy before they called the pigs in.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In the end it doesn’t really matter whether or not they did it by the book. Contrary to what procedures-fetishist liberals believe, whether or not this is valid is either up to the politics of the judge or twelve of the most paranoid nimbys the prosecutor can suss out who will see the word “trespassing” and immediately vote to convict

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't forget "breach of the peace" (ie I disapprove of you saying or doing things)

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
250 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14375 readers
791 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS