70
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kichae@wanderingadventure.party 7 points 2 months ago

LurkingLuddite Yeah, it's kind of wild that this discussion is happening on this post in particular. This is a galaxy that has multiple times more extreme gravity than other galaxies, and someone wants to use that finding as a reason to sell the idea that dark matter isn't stuff?

If it were a modling issue, then wwe'd see this everywhere. This is the opposite of evidence against dark matter.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

The sucky thing is, it could be a modeling issue, but the answer would have to be a model that agrees with all observations. For example, it could be that spacetime can get permanently warped such that gravity-like effects remain, but then how would a model represent that? If the model represents it as a field that is held in effect by some localized particle, then that 'something' might still be called "matter" even though it could be nothing more than an artifact of that particular model.

For a similar happenstance with current models, see the "graviton". If spacetime 'changes' due to the presence of matter (at least, insofar as locality and position itself is real) and nothing more, there might not actually be a graviton to discover, yet that's what the models demand to become closer to observed reality.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
70 points (100.0% liked)

Astronomy

6867 readers
40 users here now

A community for sharing astronomy-related news, content, research, photographs, etc.

When sharing photographs and articles, please make an effort to include source URLs.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS