31
submitted 2 days ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Borrowing huge sums of money to fund military expenditures sure seems silly,

TBH it's no worse than any other government jobs program, or the civil service in general. It's all just a vehicle to redistribute government funds as salaries.

[-] maplesaga@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Well its still not really sustainable is it, it has no yield.

Keynes would disapprove.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

Neither does any other government subsidy. That's an odd argument against.

[-] maplesaga@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Infrastructure would generate a future yield, and Keynes would like that. Otherwise why aren't we funding it with taxes, and why pay interest on it?

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

An industrial base generates a future yield too.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
31 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

11677 readers
528 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS