307
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
307 points (99.0% liked)
World News
40726 readers
260 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Naw, this is one of those often repeated ideas based on someone's guess being spread as a factual. Wounded troops don't actually cause more problems for a military than dead ones. Wounded can either return to combat after healing or return home to train other troops/work in factories/whatever. Dead troops means all the training that went into a person is now gone.
There's also the logistics of dealing with dead bodies, something much more resource intensive than people who are only wounded. Serious blow to morale if bodies aren't returned for funerals, nor can you leave them piled around because of disease.
I'm learning a lot from this war (including this summer) but I wasn't expecting to have to reconsider stuff like this and my friend going off about how shooting people in the leg is dumb (you have no way of knowing if they are disabled or can still get a sight picture, etc).
Wounded is different from crippled. But it is completely just a guess, that bit is right.