80
The Day 37 British Columbia MLAs Tried to Advance a Bill to Eliminate Your Basic Human Rights
(donshafer1.substack.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
80 points (98.8% liked)
Canada
11670 readers
802 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Sarnia (ON)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
- Canada Grown Business
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
- Maple Music (music)
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Anything but two you say. Great, let's make more ambiguous rules based on "your truth".
I'm fine if someone wants to call themselves a Ze or Zeh, but the ambiguity is silly and should never be codified into law. Let's not make a mockery of laws people need to follow based on peoples feelings.
You either didn't read my comment or you deliberately missed the point.
I didn't say "anything but two," I simply said something that wasn't "exactly two," and you apparently can't handle that because you seem to think your opinion is the only valid one (since you impose an arbitrary restriction such as "anything other than two is ambiguous").
It's not about how many genders there are. It's about not imposing arbitrary restrictions on how other people live their lives. No one in their right mind is trying to say "there are exactly [3, 8, 144, or however many] genders." You're the only one trying to say "there are exactly two."
You're acting like other people are trying to make laws to dictate how you live your life based on how they feel, but the truth is you are the one who wants laws dictating how other people live their lives based on how you feel.
No one is writing laws saying "you must recognize exactly eight genders." The only people trying to write laws like that are the ones who believe everyone must conform to one of exactly two genders, and that it must correspond to the sex they were assigned at birth.
Trans rights isn't about forcing you to recognize some arbitrary number. It's about being inclusive of people's identities instead of writing arbitrary rules about what they can and cannot be.
TL;DR, you're the only one trying to force your feelings about an arbitrary number of genders (in your case, two) on everyone else.
He's sealioning you, not arguing in good faith.
It's more effective to call out the behaviour than to continue to engage, since continued engagement makes it seem like there's a "debate" or "two sides" and that his side is the rational one that's "just asking questions".
That's bullshit. He knows exactly what he's doing. Trolling and trying to shift the Overton window. It's bad faith manipulation, not a conversation. Treat it as such.
You're right, I have a bad habit of arguing in circles when people do this. As if pointing out their inconsistencies/irrationalities and explaining the reality just one more time will get them to see the light. I need to stop doing that...
Reading other comments in the chain, he was doing it to other people too. Just deliberately missing the point on repeat.
I need to stop engaging with trolls...
Well sorry, its a lot to respond to, I was referencing the punishment of a 750k fine for wrongspeech. I'm not saying we should fine trans people or force them to put male/female on their birth certificate, I've got no qualms about how people view or define themselves, I'm of the belief people should even be able to go as far as to say they are any race they want. Though I also believe the government should be race/gender neutral as well, so identity would no role in our dealings with the government.