cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/48366891
When Iranian-supplied drones strike Ukrainian cities, when advanced Russian engines enhance Iran’s missile reach, when energy routes are threatened, European security is directly implicated.
...
The clearest lens through which to view the Iranian threat to Europe is the Russian engine now at its core. What began as drone deliveries to the Ukrainian battlefield has evolved into something more consequential – and more dangerous. Tehran has not only supplied Moscow with unmanned aerial systems; it has helped establish production capacity inside Russia, embedding itself in the Kremlin’s war economy.
...
The Iranian regime is a security threat to Europe. It is materially supporting Russia’s assault on Ukraine while advancing its own long-range strike capabilities. It is engaging in nuclear brinkmanship and practising economic blackmail through energy routes vital to European prosperity. This is not rhetoric; it is observable policy.
...
History shows that popular uprisings gain confidence when they sense the world is watching – and supporting. The Arab uprisings demonstrated how international visibility can shift psychological balances, emboldening citizens and unsettling regimes. Iranians have long carried a grievance that global powers exploited their country’s resources while neglecting their democratic aspirations. A credible signal of solidarity from Europe would not be cosmetic; it would be catalytic.
...
Yet Europe’s posture remains hesitant. Leaders rightly condemn the regime’s brutality, but they continue to speak reflexively of dialogue and abstract adherence to international law – as though the primary issue were diplomatic etiquette rather than strategic aggression. Europe now faces a choice.
One path is accommodation – accepting blackmail, tolerating missile expansion and preparing to manage a more radicalised regime for a generation to come. If the regime survives its current crisis, it will likely emerge more militarised and more emboldened.
The other path is to recognise opportunity. Elements of Iran’s opposition are increasingly coordinated ... Concrete steps are available. European states could freeze high-level diplomatic engagement and expel regime diplomats where security concerns justify it – particularly given recent defections from Iranian missions. They could expand targeted sanctions against hard-line officials within the judiciary and security apparatus. They could make clear, publicly and consistently, that Europe’s solidarity lies with the Iranian people rather than their rulers.
Above all, Europe must acknowledge that the Moscow–Tehran axis is not a distant abstraction. When Iranian-supplied drones strike Ukrainian cities, when advanced Russian engines enhance Iran’s missile reach, when energy routes are threatened, European security is directly implicated.
The least Europe can do for Iran is also what it must do for itself – abandon strategic ambiguity, recognise the regime as an active threat, and align openly with those Iranians seeking a different future.
They are correct.
at least as far as our protests were concerned, I remember how good it felt when we got the "Europe sees you" response, really emboldened us. Who knows if we would've succeeded without international attention.
Unfortunately, both in our case and I believe in this case too, Europe is slow to act. It has always been slow. "it's not a bug, its a feature"