538
I didn't join the revolution to read
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
538 points (90.5% liked)
Memes
55362 readers
1374 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
OK, so what are you doing to make a revolution happen?
I won't speak for Geneva (Geneva isn't a Marxist) but Marxists advocate for revolutionary party building. You can't force a revolution into happening, but you can absolutely prepare for one and build the organ needed to carry it out. Herr's a good diagram:
This explains the role of the party in forming a vanguard. This is the historically proven revolutionary strategy that has established socialism in many countries around the world.
I'm not condemning those actually fighting the empire for a start.
You do condemn those fighting the empire, though. That's why it's necessary to both read and practice, not coast by on instinct alone. You have decent political instincts, but instead you obsess over Bad Empanada thought and treat it as a substitute for reading, and posting as a substitute for practice. It's ultimately online progressivism at best, and is why it rings extraordinarily hollow when coming from you, especially as you haven't given any indication of reading or practicing, let alone both.
You aren't talking to a Marxist-Leninist, Geneva doesn't identify as such and does not read theory nor practice in a communist party. I do think Geneva's critique rings hollow, considering that.
This is bullshit. MLs say we need to act and think more, and do so by organizing in communist parties. From the Black Panther Party to PSL in the US, communist parties have been doing real organizing work, and that's not to mention the orgs that have already succeeded like the CPC.
This is blind, vibes-based critique. "Authoritarian mindset" isn't a thing. The problems with organizing in the west are not due to lacking in imagination, to the contrary, western "left" anti-communists let their imagination lead them to opposing real, existing socialism.
This is further bullshit. Marxists of the past that successfully established socialism weren't "pretending" to do so. Ironically, it's yourself that is idealizing them into "Great Men of History," and cutting out the billions of people that organized to create real socialism. MLs do not idolize Marxist figures, we study them, their contributions, their struggles, their successes and their failures, so that we can continue to sharpen our theory to guide our practice. Marxism is a science, not a dogma.
I agree, though most of us that are committed enough are already organizing in real life too.
So in other words you like to conclude a lot from no info of what I do.
Anarchists try to not pretend to have the moral high ground while doing absolutely nothing to fight the empire difficulty level: impossible.
Answer my question then.
What idiot would snitch on their own activities for online karma points? Wait let me guess: Anarchists.
I'm curious what tendency of leftist you do consider yourself, if any. Clearly you're not an anarchist, u/Cowbee who I trust said above that you do not consider yourself a Marxist-Leninst. What tendency do you come closest to aligning with?
Geneva blocked me so they can't see what I write, but if I were to describe Geneva I would say generally anti-imperialist with strong Bad Empanada influence. Geneva frequently runs into problems due to not reading theory, though, and also often accuses allies of being enemies.
For example, Geneva will take any opportunity to bash China for not doing enough, even if they are helping, and has been banned from Hexbear for accusing users of being "transzionists," which is ridiculous. Geneva is frequently correct due to being anti-west, but without a strong basis in theory and practice this is as far as you can go.