87
The Vanishing Men of Vancouver Island
(www.dismantlethemedia.ca)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Fuck right off, misogynist, can’t even acknowledge the boot comes from above, no, got to “other” women instead
Yep. "Society" is not particularly known for its treatment of women, either. It's "watch out mate, he's after your cookie" over and over again
Men are the vast majority under that boot. Read the f**king article, ya dingus.
Across Canada, the number of missing and murdered Aboriginal men is almost 5× that of aboriginal women. And yet, where are the nation-wide initiatives to solve aboriginal men’s murders and disappearances?
Suicides of men are over 5× that of women. Yet where is the pearl-clutching over those deaths?
Homelessness is almost ¾ men. And yet, homeless shelters for only women outnumber those for only men, and men’s shelters frequently have to empty out completely if there is any overflow from women’s shelters at all.
Workplace deaths of men are more than 9× that of women. And headlines only occur when it is women who suffer.
Plus, of all the jobs that aren’t at parity between men and women, the only ones women ever clamour to target are those with air conditioning and great lumbar support. Where are all the female lumberjacks? Where are the female crabbers? The coal miners and oil rig workers and the framers and plumbers and roofers?
crickets
Yyyyyup. Thought so.
You look at pretty much any personal calamity except those which are purely gender-specific, and if men aren’t neck-and-neck with women, they’re nearly always the majority of victims.
And yet, it is only those solutions that address women which are not “misogynistic”. Hell, it took nearly 40 years for “men’s mental health month” to gain traction against exactly those accusations of misogyny.
So fuck right off back, you flaming gender bigot.
No women are against men getting help. Feminism offers a framework that explains many of the problems you keep dancing around. Unfortunately, you don’t actually read any of it and instead get your worldview from incel memes and social media. You don’t care about men getting help as much as you care about creating weird wedge issues where if someone gets help it must be taking away from yourself.
Hate likes to coop terms to hide that it's hate. Feminism ≠ misandry.
Strange, because that is 100% the source of all misandry, like how any attempt to bring political attention to men’s issues is painted as “misogyny”, simply because it’s men who are being paid attention to.
Such as domestic violence. Did you know that if you look at only non-reciprocal physical violence - as in, only one person is doing the physical striking - 71% of victims are men?
And yet, who is protesting the most loudly when people try to open up DV shelters for battered men using the same public funding that women’s shelters enjoy? Small clue: they invariably identify with the term you mentioned.
71%. You’d think there would be more shelters for a 71% proportion of physically-assaulted victims. And yet, while North America has tens of thousands of shelters for the other 29%, it has only three for the 71%.
Three. In all of North America. Because public funding for it is lethally radioactive to political careers.
You are fueling the gender war.
Only women get to do that?
So true equality is “fuelling the gender war”, eh?
Why call feminism “equality”, then, if it is nothing of the sort?
Suggesting that men are betraying themselves by supporting feminism is fueling the gender war.
*Getting rid of gender related bias in mental healthcare is feminist.
*Removing gender-based barriers to all careers is feminist.
*Paternal leave policies are feminist.
*Government provision of comprehensive and inexpensive childcare services is feminist.
These policies directly support and help men. They improve men’s lives. Men should support them, if their goal is to increase opportunities, autonomy, and improve quality of life for other men. Other feminist policies seek to bring women’s opportunities, autonomy, and quality of life up to par with those of men, which indirectly helps men, as it helps the women around them be more capable, self-sufficient, and better community members.
Suggesting otherwise propagates an imaginary point of tension and stirs up distrust of women in young men. In other words, it fuels the gender war.
It was always a lie, they want advantages, not equality.
Fuck off. No, "they" don't want advantages. Try speaking with a woman in real life, you might find they are normal people!