250
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago

Penis preserving vaginoplasty is a thing. I don't think it's at all common but it is a thing

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Considering that the peen is propped up by the part that continues inside the taint, either the dick anatomy and functionality isn't quite entirely preserved, or the vagina would have to be plasted above the dick. 🤔

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 points 6 hours ago

I think it just uses the canal that's already there if you don't opt for zero-depth. Not sure how functional the vagina is though, but iirc the penis functionality is usually preserved.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Considering the extent of corpus spongiosum, part of the root of the penis, I don't see how you could shove it aside and put a hole and the vulva in there. Except if it's some kinda microvagina.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Two words: inguinal canal.

Though that would still be awkward, as it would mean the new vagina’s off to the side instead of in the middle.

Not saying it’s for sure how it’s done (I have no idea on that), just that I think that’s the “canal” OP is referencing.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Fuck me in the passage in the anterior abdominal wall, daddy.

(Also, some of the photos on the matter resemble Giger's paintings a bit too much.)

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Do the balls just gone on either side of that then? Or do they push it out of the way?

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Not sure what kind of anatomy you have where the balls are in the pathway of the dick.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Just normal anatomy. Just frequently put the balls into their storage space above.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The balls pocket isn't on my anatomy atlas.

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 10 points 17 hours ago
[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

Mmm, I would not recommend using that word when talking about real people

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
250 points (88.8% liked)

Greentext

7929 readers
1629 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS