99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bluGill@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago

There are nearly 9000 hours in a year. Performance after only 2000 isn't a useful metric. I know there are people who can give better numbers

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

They mention 100 k hours effective lifetime in the article. 11 years is good, if true.

[-] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

It's an important proof of concept. If it can survive 2,000 hours in air, then it may be possible to tweak it so it survives 20,000 in air and 2,000 in rain. Then tweak it again and it survives 200,000 hours. Engineering is iterating on a design, not developing the final product out of the gate.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
99 points (98.1% liked)

Futurology

4130 readers
6 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS