73
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

We've had of ecocomic warfare already. It was just fine for US companies to hollow out domestic manufacturing so China could build the manufacturing infrastructure that could have been built in the US.

But now that a Chinese company is building things that undercut a US company, you want protections for US billionaires that weren't afforded to US workers.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Are you ignoring the whole subsidies thing on purpose? This is not BYD attacking Tesla. This is the Chinese government attacking western industries.

[-] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

If the Chinese government is losing money on each car they export, soon China will be bankrupt. It only makes sense to buy more China cars at cheap rates and bankrupt their country.

Also, there is no proof of subsidy, it's just made up Western cope.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

USA subsidized Detroit $80B since 2008, and that's ignoring state graft for building assembly plants. What the fuck did they do with that money, attack Eastern industries?

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Well, it was $79.7B to be exact. And what the US government did with that was not cut checks, but rather, purchased stock in the companies.

When it sold the stock it bought from manufacturers, it sold for around $70B. When they sold the approximately $2.4B invested into Ally (an auto financing firm), it sold for $17.2B.

So the money spent in 2008 actually made a profit. It was not distributed to the manufacturers or finance companies at all. Just used to shore up their value to prevent them from going out of business – and more importantly, probably, make sure investors didn't lose money, or at least not too much.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

When you take into account inflation and the overall market gains over that time, they absolutely did not make their money back.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

When you take into account that the original assertion was tht eighty billion was given to the auto manufacturers, I don't think my comment deserves the reaction it got, not a reply like yours.

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

Yes.

The only terms under which I could potential accept tax money being used to save a company from a collapse leading to massive layoffs, is if the resulting company is also made entirely employee owned.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, that's not how it would happen and you know it.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

82797 readers
814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS