227
China bad tho, right lemmy liberals?
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
227 points (70.2% liked)
Memes
54987 readers
745 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Lol you're doing the angry 12 year old thing of throwing up your hands and going "Oh so China must be an absolute perfect heaven on earth, huh?!"
That's the commentary you folk give give though. Every post is US bad, any knows issues with cha are lies
Now you're doing the 12 year old "This thing I'm doing is actually what you're doing".
Sounds very familiar here
Lol bro i am begging you to at least act 13
I've actually conversed with 13 year olds who literally opened my mind to communism with well researched and worded arguments (not angry ones).
Cool as, dumbass
Have you considered a lot of your criticism are not accepted or have paragraphs of ~~denials~~ analysis because a lot of your criticism stem from a faulty base understanding and/or analysis (such as overstating the scale/scope of the issue if it exists or hammering on criticisms that aren't real like the "genocide")?
Just an example of what I'm talking about: The hukou system in the modern day is deeply flawed and there are many criticisms to be made of it such as it leading to wage disparity etc. However if I were to then say that the hukou system never made any sense, was senseless cruelty or some other such nonsense jumped off from it that would necessitate a few paragraphs of explanation and rebuttal to reach the truth of the matter. Which is that the system in the modern day is outdated and harmful but was a necessary policy to avoid massive slums forming and despite it's harms does have some positive aspects such as the guaranteed land and homesteading rights should one end up homeless.
It's important that criticism be principled and precise for it to have any meaning. I'd be very interested to hear some of your criticisms that were faced with paragraphs of "denials".
The issue is that the "criticisms" that people bring up aren't reality, they're propaganda. We can talk about real issues just fine, if/when you spend the time first learning how China really is, then we can actually have a productive discussion and treat you seriously. As it is we're not gonna act as if disproven shit is real.
Have you considered that what looks like "dissertations" might just be people applying materialist analysis, seeking truth from facts against the propaganda wave?
That China, flaws and contradictions included, has still secured historical wins for the proletariat of the periphery (especially in China), while the Western imperial bloc runs and has been running the world's largest and most advanced exploitation and immiseration machine in human history on throughout the periphery?
So of course dissecting China takes nuance to weigh the real gains against the flaws and discern the truth from the wave of lies?
When you do a material analysis of the West and what's left to weigh? Just capitalist plunder, imperialist immiseration, and fascism.
Sort feed by new comments. See comment. Reply. That is how forums work. An hour is not a stakeout.
Your real argument at its core is that no Chinese(or otherwise) person could genuinely support the Chinese government unless they are paid or brainwashed. That is chauvinism. You dismiss my lived experience, my family's gains, and the material progress hundreds of millions have seen because it does not fit your Western notions of "how it should be".
It is the same logic as the person earlier today in this very thread who told me mainlanders only support the government because we "do not know any better." Different person, same paternalism. Any Chinese(or otherwise) person who offers a nuanced, factual critique that weighs both gains and flaws must be compromised. Any mass consensus in China must be manufactured. The only valid analysis, in your view, is the one that confirms Western superiority.
I am not paid. I am not brainwashed. I am someone who applies materialist analysis and sees what China has actually delivered for its people. If that threatens your worldview, that is your problem. Not mine.
Usually these same people are oblivious to the propaganda they swim in, but have a dissenting viewpoint and you’re the paid agitator.
Propaganda is only taught in elite universities because only future mandarins of public opinion are supposed to understand it.
Much like the old soviet joke:
Not true I discuss communist theory among other topics.
Also
Again not true. I use this account to practice my English while discussing something I had enough interest in to get a masters degree in (Marxist theory). China makes up a large portion as being the largest and most successful socialist state to date it is a major topic of discussion. Did you think this reply through at all? Bootlicking is when you have a nuanced take on a government. You are a brain poisoned by your dogshit government that sees you as less than dogshit.
So when you said "Which reeks of people paid to post biased propaganda" you weren't implying the people replying to you with analysis and nuance were paid?
Communists posting essays is literally a meme even in the west. To be a communist requires study of dense theory is it really that surprising communists are elequent and can get verbose when it comes to debating a topic they have studied far more than you clearly have?
my entire home feed is is set to comments then sorted by new.
You should stop getting pissy and try actually engage with the content of what the communists and Chinese people who are correcting you when you "criticise" China are saying. No one says China is perfect but all the criticisms need to be taken in the context of the material conditions and the both the good and the bad for them to be worth anything more than a toddlers tantrum.
"Anyone who argues against the firehose of fascist propaganda that America puts out about countries it doesn't like must be paid propagandists".