view the rest of the comments
Off My Chest
RULES:
I am looking for mods!
1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.
2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)
3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.
4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.
5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.
6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.
We used to be graded on penmanship in our writing. Nobody was particularly upset when typing rendered a penmanship grade irrelevant. It became an unimportant metric to track; people with truly abysmal handwriting became perfectly capable authors. Penmanship was handed from author to artist.
LLMs are rapidly making structure and composition unimportant to the author. They are beginning to be able to convey ideas without being overly concerned with format. We need not be particularly concerned with the diminishing importance of this metric; people with little understanding of format can now become perfectly capable authors. Structure and composition is being handed over from author to poet.
AI provides a direct, immediate answer to every question you put before it. It provides that in a well-crafted, predictable, easy-to-read format. The student is not wrong for wanting this kind of response. It is what they, themselves, are asked to provide.
That the answer is rarely correct doesn't particularly phase them: They lack the experience to be able to identify the falsehoods. They haven't learned to question the lack of citation and attribution, or to cross check sources.
Where we now need to focus is on the roots of thought. The formation of ideas. The determination between fact and fiction.
Divide the class up into groups of three. The members of each group are to individually write a paper on the same, narrow topic. But, they are to deliberately include in their paper one to four significant falsehoods on their subject. Feel free to use AI.
Give the three papers to another group, and have them identify and prove the lies.
As the author, any intentional lie you manage to slip past the checkers earns big points. Any undeclared lie caught by the checkers costs you big points.
As the checker, every intentional lie you discover earns a few points. Every unintentional lie you catch earns big points. Every intentional lie you miss costs big points.
Your students were so focused on critical thinking tasks that they barely realize how much research they have put into the two topics they worked on.