482
I'm watching you (programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who says linux is bad? At worst people say it's too hard for them to use at home, but i never heard someone say it's bad.

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 44 points 1 month ago

I’ve heard people make the argument that Linux is bad because it’s too hard to use.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

First inpressions matter. The thing most people want operating systems to do is get out of the way. And while using Linux is great (so long as your software supports it), setting it up is not seamless. If you want to install Linux, new users have to spend 8 hours surfing 20 boards to be told 30 different answers about which distro to use. And that's before you even get started.

If you want to install Windows, you just fucking install Windows.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's bad to recommend to less tech-literate people. It's bad to force on someone in general.

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 1 points 1 month ago

Who is forcing Linux on anyone?

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I've had an IT guy try to make me use Linux. I tried and failed, so he put Windows back on. I felt shame.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago

Typical Linux distributions are almost objectively harder to use than Android. I'd be surprised if anyone really disagrees with this. When someone complains about Linux being hard to use, it's the POSIX-based Linux distributions that must support arbitrary hardware (often poorly so) that they refer to. I don't need to care about installing NVidia drivers and whether they're compatible with EFI handover when I buy an Android phone.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

Typical Linux distributions are almost objectively harder to use than Android

So are Windows and macOS.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Sorry I don't follow your point.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago

I think they meant that the comparison should be between desktop OSes.

The fact that the meme mentions desktop and phone OSes is probably because one is likely to use both.

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You do need to worry about whether or not your phone is locked to a specific carrier and if its the carrier you want to use the phone with. or, if its a phone you want to bring to another network, you have to figure our if you need to argue with your current carrier to get it unlocked.

To piggyback off this, Windows is also "harder" than Android. You need to reinstall Windows due to an update fuckup? You tried building your own PC? Well, you either fork.over $120 for an installation media, or you have to create your own, then learn how to boot into the BIOS to boot from that media, then you need to scour the internet for not only your Nvidia driver, but your audio driver, WiFi driver, integrated graphics driver (if you have and want to use an IGPU) and possibly motherboard drivers if your mobo has some odd implementation that requires a driver for USB 3.1 to work properly.

None of these operating systems are "harder" than another. You are just used to one over the other. You don't use your automatic transmission car skills trying to drive a manual transmission, unless your goal is to crash and burn.

[-] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 5 points 1 month ago

You do need to worry about whether or not your phone is locked to a specific carrier and if its the carrier you want to use the phone with

Laughs in Canadian

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

please let me in I beg of thee

[-] ramasses@social.ozymandias.club 2 points 1 month ago

Cries in us, its horrible

[-] variablenine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

massgrave proves my point. The user has to go out of their way to find and run that script.

Linux would just work ootb. No activation needed. Ergo; Linux is easier than Windows.

It's poor form to say an apple tastes worse than an orange because its purely opinion. Theres no fact. I was trying to show the original reply is nonsensical, because for some, Android is harder than Linux. Android may not be what someone is used to.

[-] funkajunk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Usually people who installed it yesterday and are mad it doesn’t behave exactly like the OS they’ve been using for the last 20 years (which they also had to learn how to use)

[-] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 1 points 1 month ago

TBF it does have a glaring lack of automation for way too much of the basics. Even hand holding distros like Mint will have you using the terminal for something windows just does with a double click.

FTR I prefer Linux over Windows but I still lose it every time installation instructions for some app have 4 pages of commands for the CLI instead of just running an installer that automates the BS.

[-] funkajunk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe 10 years ago, but for me installing anything is done with a single command (pacman or yay)

Are you using some sort of niche software?

[-] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 1 points 1 month ago

Every piece of software that doesn't come with the default repositories, which in many distros includes the 'niche' software of vidcard drivers. Samba network sharing v1, disabled in both Windows and Linux, is a simple double click of the app feature to reenable in Windows. In Linux, you have to change entries in at least 2 files, assuming you can find correct instructions in the first place.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago

I mean you have to find those check boxes in Windows too.

I do think some things in Linux are still not super user friendly, but for example installing apps is much better. Sure something may not be in the repo, even if some distros have impressively vast ones, but even that is easily solved with flatpak and appimage nowadays.

[-] funkajunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Samba v1 has been disabled by default for years in Windows, because of security concerns. If m$ is even warning against using it, you probably shouldn't use it.

Enabling something that's deprecated as fuck is not a very good example.

[-] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online -2 points 1 month ago

Hey, you know what is a good example? Every app not included in the default app repository. But, you conveniently skipped that to make a useless point. GG.

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's not that Linux is bad, it's the fans of it that are annoying

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Ok. How is that relevant to the post or the comment?

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's responding to "you say Linux is bad". If you pretend the funny cat picture is someone talking, and my comment is someone talking back, it makes sense.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Apparently, non-cats.

[-] calango@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago

It's a meme, you just got on the internet yesterday, huh?

So it's just not true at all, got it lol

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
482 points (91.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

31253 readers
2144 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS