view the rest of the comments
Off My Chest
RULES:
I am looking for mods!
1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.
2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)
3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.
4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.
5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.
6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.
I'm a non-traditional student and I have used AI to help with math.
Let me explain something. When I try to do a general search for help on how to solve a problem the top results in most search engines aren't the old Academy style videos of guides anymore. They are sponsored links, paid tutoring websites, and YouTube videos of people playing at influencer instead of teaching.
The same is true for researching most given topics.
I have tried to use AI ethically but I know it's problematic.
When trying to find sources the old academic websites still hold but finding those websites I had to ask AI with a crafted prompt. At times I did ask it to suggest papers a academic sources. I then used my own critical analysis to decide the sources biases and value for the source and explored around further by looking at the good papers source list.
I see the problems with AI but a boolean search only works so well these days.
Going back to math, I could watch a video, but it's sitting through precious time when an AI will answer my question directly and explain the reason I was wrong.
Even if I'm trying to use a math website that actually answers the problem, there will be pop-ups (on the phone) useless text (as if it's a damn recipe website) and possibly mathematical syntax that is above my course level.
Using the AI I can have that syntax explained.
I do understand that AI is a problem and I hate HATE getting info from a middle man like this but I complete understand why a student would.
I also see how tempting it is to just skip those extra steps and take an answer, but I know it also is often wrong. My verification steps and further digging ensures that the AI is returning valid info.
But why do students do it? Because the internet today is a slop bog that they have to navigate on thier phones. Often with minimal protection from ads and other useless garbage.
Wolfram alpha is much better for the purpose you describe than a generative LLM. The “show steps” button costs $5/mth.
I’ve experimented with it for math (was stuck on a Project Euler problem, it did give me the algorithm but absolutely flounced it’s sample calculation), and it can get some stuff right, but provide an incorrect explanation. Or fuck up a numerical calculation entirely.
Depending on what you are pursuing a degree in, another thing to keep in mind is that math conceptually builds on itself. If you are just trying to survive a math credit it’s like Cliff’s Noting a book for a paper - nothing will stick for you long term using AI.
What class is it? PatrickJMT is good if you’ve gone to calculus.
WA was too inacurrate for me to use when i was college, asking the actual question was found on some sites word for word.