443
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] motruck@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Two competing standards of shit. Snap which is broken and flstpak which is also broken. Can we just work on one shitty thing and make it better please? You missed the boat Ubuntu no one wants your shitty attempt at co-opting the open source packaging market.

[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago

How is Flatpak broken? I'm using it constantly and it... just works?

[-] atomicStan@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

Not the person you asked. But the only thing I can think of, would be how the flatpak's sandbox might cause friction. Most of the time, you won't even notice it. But, once every while, it shows its ugly face.

For example, the situation around native messaging is still a mess. This prevents e.g. your flatpak browser from communicating with your locally installed password manager. While a(n ugly) workaround exists, it's quite maddening that it hasn't been resolved in all these years ๐Ÿ˜….

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
443 points (91.2% liked)

Linux

12911 readers
736 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS