111
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
111 points (94.4% liked)
PC Gaming
14785 readers
666 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, then I'm either thinking of an older DLSS, or something else entirely.
BBC ran an article with a bit more to it, showing the same Resident Evil image with/without DLSS 5, and it looked more different than I expected it to. So nah, I'm not gonna defend this.
Yeah. Previous generations of DLSS were about achieving the same result with less.
DLSS 5 is about "improving" what was previously the end result, even in cases where DLSS wouldn't have been needed in the first place.
Nvidia is claiming it achieves "hollywood movie cgi" fidelity.
In practice it looks like the result is just not pleasant.