90
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A couple of 20-year-old developers make $500,000 a month promising to help men to stop watching porn, but exposed their private porn watching habits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

EDIT: Folks very fairly pointed out the dismissiveness of my wording, and y’all are right. While I do think therapy can and does help with addictions of any type, my wording about guilt rather than addressing the actual addiction only served the humor I was going for and wasn’t respectful for the condition. I’m leaving what I wrote as is below mostly because the quip about birding and boobies still gives me a chuckle.

Men will do literally anything other than go to fucking therapy. Jesus. Guys. You’re allowed to watch porn, let’s just direct the fear of people finding out into finding ethical porn you don’t need to feel guilt for. Or better yet, pay for your porn and support creators directly.

Also find some hobbies that get you out of the goon cave. Take up fucking birding and go find some different boobies.

[-] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago
[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Not just tits, bushtits too! And boobies of course. Can't forget the mighty cock.

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

Come to NZ and see a titipounamu, morepork, kaka

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hmm. Might need a bird addiction app.

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Are there any ASMR puppy play birds?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

I suppose an appropriately trained parrot might do.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

You’re allowed to watch porn, let’s just direct the fear of people finding out into finding ethical porn you don’t need to feel guilt for.

I mean, YMMV on that ethical porn business. I've found that to be more of a marketing gimmick than anything I can sleep soundly on.

Might just settle on not feeling guilty for beating off.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

To be clear though, you should just watch the birds.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Porn addiction has nothing to do with feeling guilty about porn or masturbation, and if you think that's the problem you have no business pronouncing on it.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You're not wrong, but like gambling, porn addiction exists, but that goes to your first point about therapy. I don't understand why anyone would load this type of information into an app. I assume it's ignorance to technology, which is sad, but I can't help but think how anyone would think it's a good idea.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Most people don't really even think about privacy.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] Leather@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Porn / sex "addiction" does not exist. Some nice folks who were super invested in proving it gave up a while back.

Most people have perfectly average porn / sex use, and are shamed by a partner or cultural messages.

A small percentage of people deal with "OCSB", out of control sexual behavior.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I disagree, but that's fine. There are people that squeeze porn into every open minute of their lives, sacrifice relationship is because of it, and spend more than they have to view it. If that's not addiction, then we might as well say that any non-chemical vice can't be considered one, like gambling.

[-] super_user_do@feddit.it 0 points 1 week ago

Just because many people don't seem to notice their addiction that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The methodology used to disprove the existence of porn addiction is just to completely and utterly ignore all the people who experience it and than claiming it doesn't exist

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Reading through this thread has been a bizarre experience - I genuinely couldn't have imagined the amount of pushback you get here just for speaking up for people struggling with this. It seems exactly the kind of thing I'd have expected deep compassion for, given the userbase here.

Still, my conclusion is that much of it boils down to the term "addiction" - since it's a medical term, people seem to think that once you medicalize it, you're paving the way to ban it.

Personally I don't care what term we use. If people prefer "compulsive porn use," then fine. For me the point has always been the lived experience of what people mean when they talk about living with a porn addiction - even if it officially doesn't count as one. In my opinion it does, because it checks virtually all the boxes of the standard definition: you need more of it, you seek out more extreme stuff, you get cravings when you stop, and you keep going long after the negatives have started to outweigh the positives. If that's not addiction, then I don't know what is.

[-] hammertime@lemmy.org -1 points 1 week ago

At least they’ll be jerking it with some sunshine.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
90 points (100.0% liked)

News

36711 readers
1213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS