100
What's going on with hexbears
(lemm.ee)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
100 points (87.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43965 readers
1198 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Go check what's happening on shitjustworks instance currently and say that again. It's absolutely not just a problem of "posting culture", that's downplaying who they are and what they do.
They're just straight up toxic 99% of the time and they don't seem to want to do anything about it. It's a resounding echo of a sentiment on most Lemmy instances that it is how they act and yet, I still see weird and factually wrong takes like this.
I feel like we’re playing a semantics game here.
We are definitely referring to the same behavior.
This is, for most people including me, toxic behavior. They have a toxic posting culture.
It helps if you engage with the “takes” before you label them.
Point being that simply calling it a different "posting cultures" isn't just semantic, it's downplaying what they do.
We shouldn't downplay racists, genocide deniers and trolls.
I am downplaying nothing. I call it “culture” because it’s not about a substantive disagreement about politics or ideology. It’s about the way they engage with each other and the world around them. Their collective pattern of behavior. There is a word for that. It’s called culture. And it’s pretty fucking hard to break out of.
I find your insistence to dig in here frankly a bit baffling.
Calling them just "fighters" is downplaying. Calling that a simple "culture", instead using the proper call out like I did, is downplaying.
You telling me to engage and then baffled that I "dig" is making you look like them more and more.
It is technically "culture". It is far from being only that though, and you somehow chose the least incriminating word to describe them.
That is baffling imo.