76
$30,000,000,000 Question: Canada’s F-35 Debate Seems Paralyzed
(www.19fortyfive.com)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
The details are classified, but just a look at the visible design and common sense about how smart they are will tell you they didn't only pay attention to a few frequencies. The coating isn't only (a variety of) split-ring resonators either, it sounds like there is a chemical component of some kind.
From what I've heard, any frequencies where they're weak will be very low ones, which both require bigger, more obvious equipment and are less precise. And even then it might be a matter of a basketball-sized signature rather than a golf ball-sized one, and will be somewhat directional.
Sure, but the rest of the sky (AKA outer space) is non-reflective, so how do you get your negative return back?
This falls in the "why don't you just" category of talking about fields you don't understand. Sure, there's an actual good idea you're moving towards, but it's kind of clear you don't know what you don't know.
It's not a Boeing.