88
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I honestly don't know what enforcement actions would be taken, but I do think a company like Canonical could be held liable for anything seen as defying such new laws. Maybe you're right. That would make me happy if you are.

[-] BladeFederation@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That does seem to be the intention, to hold companies liable, I just dont see how that would possibly work. Similar situations have happened with DMCA copyright stuff. Some foreign pirate sites were fined by the American government, and the sites literally told them to fuck off.

And what if some countries create laws that state you cannot recklessly gather users' personal information? Who do you obey? Do you pay a fine no matter what? Are you banned in one country? How would that be enforced?

Not only do I fundamentally disagree with what they're trying to do, it simply doesn't make sense in the first place, nor does their implementation.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
88 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

12991 readers
313 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS