110
Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism (itsfoss.com)
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@europe.pub to c/linux@programming.dev
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Dylan M. Taylor is not a household name in the Linux world. At least, he wasn’t until recently.

The software engineer and longtime open source contributor has quietly built a respectable track record over the years: writing Python code for the Arch Linux installer, maintaining packages for NixOS, and contributing CI/CD pipelines to various FOSS projects.

But a recent change he made to systemd has pushed him into the spotlight, along with a wave of intense debate.

At the center of the controversy is a seemingly simple addition Dylan made: an optional birthDate field in systemd’s user database.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 18 points 18 hours ago

What do you mean, he “admitted” that?

It’s quite literally the first thing he wrote in his pull request to systemd:

Stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

And the second paragraph of his pull request to arch:

Recent age verification laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc. require platforms to verify user age. Collecting birth date at install time ensures Arch Linux is compliant with these regulations.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, I didn't think he was being ap transparent that he was doing something evil

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
110 points (91.7% liked)

Linux

12991 readers
313 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev