118

The number of Psyops is increasing drastically (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 week ago by MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As most of you know, I am from Palestine, and something I’ve been noticing recently is the coverage that a lot of brainless goofs are getting.

On the internet especially, but people shouldn’t pretend the internet is not part of our lives.

The main three people I am referring to here are Tucker Carlson, Prof Jiang, and John Kiriakou.

The least brainless here is the guy that worked for the CIA.

Who do you think is behind the coverage and visibility they are getting?

My parents have heard about those three and have seen videos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

people trying to make sense of empire behavior without saying word empire, thus psyops

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

"Psyop" is a more meaningful term than "empire behavior".

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the psychological operation of "eternally bumbling empire" now with "run by pedophiles" dlc and "youtube" expansion pack.

i don't think it's qualitatively that different from discourse around 2005, the medium and dispersion of personalities (individuals rather than networks, no editorial voice as such) changes, but eh

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Nothing ever changes

[-] MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

I am more interested in who's doing the promoting ?

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

tucker is self-sustaining entity-skeptic wing (probably capital as well, for future fash presidency, can't parse if he is paleocon wing or fake-out), kiriakou is a world historic dipshit (see 17n), jiang seems like just dead ender for tucker-curious to falun gong pipeline, so same eh, haven't seen anything aside from some tweets. all perfectly compatible with different wings of capital (for example, i don't think non-military digital capital is thrilled about instability in gulf, just as it might not be thrilled with chinese decoupling)

like say i'm tim cook/apple investor, why on earth would i enjoy seeing this shit? same goes for like copper and manufacturing, defense industry inputs are tiny compared to construction. like you can just go industry by industry, and get ideas