351
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CombatLiberalism@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago

Every person involved in making this decision deserves to be buried in an unmarked grave with the weapons they love so much. How many innocent people completely uninvolved with the war are going to grow up suffering the effects of depleted uranium rounds? Another absolutely monstrous decision in a long line of monstrous decisions by the US government.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They aren't that dangerous as a weapon of war. The uranium is depleted, as the name suggest. The alternative is heavy metal, which is also dangerous to breathe in. It's war and it sucks for health. Maybe there shouldn't have been an invasion...

[-] Babs@hexbear.net 66 points 1 year ago

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903104/ this shit is still causing birth defects in Iraq. This is Ukraine's future now.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

And so do other heavy metals. What do you suggest they use that won't have negative health impacts (which is ironic for something designed to kill, but whatever)?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (63 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
351 points (91.9% liked)

World News

32323 readers
855 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS