39
submitted 1 year ago by Mujumat@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you actually read the paper, or just its abstract?

Edit: it's a genuine question, folks. This is a science community.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

how could he have read the abstract? The link is a science article, not the study.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Where did I mention that I was referring to the article?

The parent poster wrote "the paper," so I was referring to the paper. Not the article.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Im betting when he said paper he meant the link in the post. At least I thought so. I get what you are saying but in an internet forum I usually assume words are used in the most generic sense.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well, that just falls in the realms of opinions. I could agree with you in a different context. But in this community about scientific discussion, I'll assume the parent poster meant paper when they wrote paper.

Regardless, that's why I asked the question as a clarification.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Eldermantle@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

FWIW I think it was a fair question.

[-] Eldermantle@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Hmm… I thought I’d read the paper, but it turned out I got confused by an abstract with multiple sections. I thought it was very short. My mistake

So I can’t say whether the authors addressed whether the low carbohydrate group was selecting for people already known to be at risk.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
39 points (73.5% liked)

science

14595 readers
309 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS