85
Optical illusion (i.redd.it)
submitted 1 week ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hey, look, it's divisive rhetoric!

Crimes and violence are caused by unjustified heirarchies, in particular, the ruling class ruling over the working class.

You know what would reduce school shootings? Publicly funded mental health services for young people.

This kind of post is aimed at dividing the working class into two groups, pro-gun, and anti-gun. Refuse to give in to their messaging. Solidarity across the WHOLE working class!

[-] 5wim@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago
[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

nothing on this comic advocates against publicly funded mental health services

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

My point is that we can fight together to advance our mutual goals instead of arguing amongst ourselves while the tides of a far greater battle are turning against us.

Fight the ruling class, the rest of our problems will be much easier to solve once they are removed from power.

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 week ago

Sure, but know what else would reduce school shootings?

Less guns.

[-] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Would it? Is that the only solution?

Why do Yemen and Switzerland have such high ownership and no school shootings?

Don't get me wrong, less guns would be good for many reasons. And I think we can get there, eventually. But right now, I have zero confidence that our government is fit to enforce any law fairly. Neonazis are openly running the DoD and ICE, this is not the time to dial back the Bill of Rights.

Which is more likely, funding for better mental health services as a whole or removing guns from the unwilling?

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

How about both? Why do you pretend it's one or the other?

Give free mental health support AND prohibit guns. Best of both worlds

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

So, Australia doesn't publicly fund mental health treatment and still hav3 way, way less gun deaths.

We also have way less guns.

You guys have stock standard excuses. None of them are true.

Boy, I bet it's that simple of a solution and not multifaceted of a problem. Not to mention I don't think Australia is in the middle of a literal fascist take over, so you know, might as well disarm to be helpless, right? Seriously, the child like mentality of guns being bad when there's social ills that plague society that results in more violence overall, not just gun violence, is annoying.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

That response lacks internal logic.

  1. The countries I mentioned, including Australia, have a multifaceted solution. Heavy restrictions on weapon ownership. A very strict permit system. A refusal to grant a permit until authorised training has been completed. A valid reason for gun ownership (such as membership in a gun club). Mandatory gunsafe compliance - the police can do spot checks on gun storage without a warrant. These are a suite of Solutions, not a single magic bean that you suggest are impossible, except they are possibly.

  2. You refer to the likelihood of getting rid of guns because of Trump's fascist state? Is that the latest excuse? What was the problem before 2016 then?

Look, American gun culture is what it is. It probably is impossible now to reverse things. But own it and don't keep coming up with all these nonsensical excuses because they work fine in peer countries.

  1. The multifaceted issues isn't just low levels of gun control, but rising poverty, severity of poverty, and strong instances of institutional racism. That's the tip of it. This country is inherently hostile to POC which leads onto...
  2. If you think this fascist state issue is only Trump then you're not paying attention and don't talk to older POC in the USA. Legislation like the Mulford Act is only there to prevent POC from being able arm, protect, and police themselves from the violence of the police.
  3. This is what gets me, people like you looking in with only a select view not seeing everything in this country. You see what you want to see and make a half-thought up conclusion. Not being white in this country is to have one inherently hostile for you and that marginalizes you. Realistically as well, most gun control is unevenly used against them as well, again refer to the Mulford Act.
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Racism and inequality exist everywhere, man. It just does. I've seen it in France, Germany, England, Singapore and India. It definitely exists in Australia. If you think guns will fix the problem, or even alleviate it, you will have to show me the evidence, because the US is awash in firearms and things aren't improving. Especially for POC.

What it boils down to, every damn time, is the idea of American exceptionalism. It won't work in America because reasons. Even if systems are placed in other countries, and work fine, it won't work in the states. It is one of the reasons why the US won't adopt the metric system. Only the US and two third world countries haven't made the switch. That's fine, but American exceptionalism has now led you guys into a war that nobody wanted except Israel. Even two thirds of your own country don't want it. This is not a question of gun control, it's an issue of talking yourself into a position, and defending it to the literal death of your own people.

I'm not going to try and convince you anymore. It's no skin off my nose how America runs it's own country. But Americans aren't all that special. People in other countries laugh, poop, sleep, cry, drive, walk and sing, etc. Any system can be adopted if the will of the people want it badly enough. And you guys apparently want to be the world leaders in gun deaths per capita, and that's your decision. But don't try to blame it on the belief that you are an extraordinary different people. You've not.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Oh yes, gun nutters will murder people if you try and take their guns away. They will also just murder people period.

There is no mental help for these terrorists.

[-] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm a firm believer of firearm ownership, especially for the marginalized groups in the USA right now. That said we need better mental health services and people who have a distinct lack of empathy should not own one to begin with.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yes, arm both sides like the fascist love to do. Clearly you have the wool pulled over your eyes.

Removal of firearms is also a fascist thing. I'd rather have an armed trans person next to me than a RWNJ. That trans person is higher likely to be mentally stable, trained, and practiced. As well given the targeting of trans people to marginalize them to the point that they can then be exterminated as is the Heritage Foundation's plan, I'm going to say you have a lousy take.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Giving guns to trans isn't going to solve the problem and you should be ashamed for suggesting it is anything other than setting people up to be killed. Your take is impossibly dumb.

You seem to think that they'll be allowed to live under this regime in the first place. Also why is it that they want to take away their ways to arm and organize exactly? What could be the reason they would want them isolated and unarmed?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Listen, I am not going to advocate for making a trans army/militia to solve our domestic problems. Go satiated your bloodlust somewhere else.

Ahh yes, self defense is blood lust. You sound more neo-liberal every post.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Go talk to someone else about your murder fantasies. Sick.

Can't offer good rebutals and doesn't deny being a neo-liberal and thus an actual fascist simp.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Says the fascist trying to arm people.

Oh lord, you sound like MAGA. Here's a hint, you can't be fascist and be a left wing person. Fascism is a far right wing ideology. Love me, love me, I'm a liberal!

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Wow, first I am a Neo Lib and now I am a Maga. Good thing I can consistently call you the fascist that you are.

Tell me you're entirely uneducated about political positioning and ideologies without telling me.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Says the guy wildly throwing around political terms.

Still won't tell me why fascists want an unarmed population, especially of the easily marginalized. Still thinks communal defense is blood lust. Calls an avowed socialist a fascist, doesn't seem to understand what it really means. It's just a sad state of affairs how utterly uninformed you are. I'm no expert but I at least look up information so I'm not as ignorant. Instead you seem to revel in it.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Listen, there are more guns in the US than people. It hasn't solved our problems. People that think guns solve problems are the definition of fascists. Guns are an oppressive force and fascist recognize this. That is why they make sure to always have them.

Yes, you are no expert. You don't even have a basic grasp of what is fascism let alone that you are a fascist. You throw around terms wildly without understanding them. You push dangerous rhetoric that will get more people killed. I am struggling to see you in a positive light

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
85 points (94.7% liked)

Comic Strips

23156 readers
436 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS