623
submitted 1 month ago by Karmanopoly@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

Stupid question, but does pihole offer any substantial benefit over using a remote ad-blocking DNS like AdGuard or whatever?

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Please ignore the other two commenters.....

Adblockers block ads at the user level, meaning you have to manage the adblocker for each device in your ecosystem.

PiHole and similar DNS based ad blocking technologies OTOH block ads at the network level and only needs one install location to manage content for all devices you have on your network.

This means with PiHole you can have one set of custom rules that block all ads at the network level by using a set of pre-loaded and customizeable DNS blocklists. OR! you can install Ublock on 2 devices in your house and let the other 7 devices that have no access to adblockers (like IoT devices) be subject to the atrocity that is modern advertising.

Additionally, adblockers in browsers can eventually be shut off. See: Google Chrome and Ublock Origin.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But what does a pihole (which is DNS blocking) do that AdGuard's free public DNS (which is DNS blocking) doesn't? Of course uBlock Origin alongside them is better, but what's a pihole specifically doing?

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was pretty specific as to what advantages PiHole has over Ublock alone.

Please re-read the above comment and lmk if I can clarify anything.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

He was asking about pi hole versus and AdGuard DNS.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And I was pretty specific about PiHole over AdGuard's public DNS. And to be honest, the person you originally replied to was as well.

[-] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Yes but there are public DNS servers that block blacklisted domains. I can set that as DNS in my router settings and it works the same as using pihole as a blacklisting DNS server, right?

[-] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

They're basically the same thing

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It’s a good way to dip your toes into learning about Linux, self-hosting, and administering reliable services.

Functionally they are the same though.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Please see my comment parallel to yours.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

This thread is about dns level blocking not client side blocking.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Its both, actually. Ublock is client side and only available on Firefox, PiHole is network wide and available for anyone who can setup a simple DNS server.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Yes. And the person I replied to was asking if running your own dns is somehow different than using an opinionated dns service. The answer is no.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
623 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

55726 readers
443 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS