200
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Iranians celebrating the beginning of the ceasefire under the framework of Iran's 10 Points.


Mere hours before Trump's 8pm Tuesday deadline yesterday, Pakistan's government contacted Iran with a US-written proposal for a two-week ceasefire, explicitly stated to also include Lebanon, during which they would negotiate a permanent end to the war on the basis of Iran's 10 Points. Among other things, these points include 1) maintaining strict control (joint with Oman) over Hormuz, complete with a toll; 2) the end of sanctions on Iran; 3) keeping their enriched uranium; 4) a withdrawal of US forces from the Middle East [stated by the Supreme Leadership Council but not in the 10 Points, so who knows], and 5) some plausible guarantee that Iran would never be attacked again. I've heard rumors that China may have prodded Iran to accept these terms.

In theory, these are relatively confident and maximalist demands. In practice, Iran has already achieved military and economic control over Hormuz and the withdrawal of many US troops and bases from the region, so at least a few of Iran's demands are, to a greater or lesser extent, already achieved, and with little hope for an increasingly exhausted US to undo these achievements short of nukes.

A couple hours after the ceasefire, the Zionist entity began a wave of airstrikes in Lebanon, killing hundreds of civilians, as well as flying drones into Iranian airspace. This was a strange move to make even if you assume - very sensibly - that the US is completely agreement non-capable: why not agree to the ceasefire and simply pretend to negotiate for two weeks while regrouping/repairing what assets you can and then start hitting Iran again?

One theory is that the Zionists are testing to what degree Iran is actually willing to have solidarity with Lebanon and Hezbollah. While the Resistance has been relatively united since October 7th, the formation of separate peaces instead of negotiating terms as a united front has been a major exploitable weakness. Alternatively, it's been proposed that the US didn't even consider using the ceasefire to regroup and deceive Iran, and that Trump merely wanted a way to chicken out of his threat on Iran's electrical grid - the fact that US officials have since stated that Iran's 10 Points were not the same ones they agreed to is a point supporting this, I suppose. If the conflict resumes and Trump does not deliver another 48 hour deadline (and/or makes it something silly like a month from now) then this could be the explanation.

From Iran, I am getting the sense that a lot is happening behind the scenes. Statements from top officials like Araghchi have stated quite plainly that there will be no ceasefire and no negotiations unless the Zionists stop attacking Lebanon, but as of ~24 hours after the ceasefire began, there has been no significant military response from Iran yet. There have apparently been phone calls between Araghchi and numerous regional officials, but it is unknown to what end. All the while, the global economic situation continues to deteriorate. Over the next week or two, the last tankers that left Hormuz before it closed will arrive at their destinations. If the missile exchanges begin once more, then the West, much like most of the rest of the world, will be experiencing all sorts of fuel, energy, food, and product shortages while trying to justify why they broke the ceasefire to kill more Lebanese civilians.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 50 points 2 weeks ago

It is a couple of weeks old but I didn't see the story before. I think it is fun because israel is basically forcing france to act how a slightly more ethical state would. It is doing (half assed) BDS on itself.

Maybe this thin-skinned catty bullshit will work out for the best? Like when you can't even stand to be in the same room as france because they are too complacent about the general threat of islam against europe. How many little kerfuffles like this would it take to bring the whole project down?

Israel halts defense trade with France, citing ‘hostile attitude,’ sources tell ‘Post’ (March 31)

fulltext

Israel halts defense trade with France, citing ‘hostile attitude,’ sources tell ‘Post’

YONAH JEREMY BOB, AMICHAI STEIN

MARCH 31, 2026 11:17

Israel has halted defense trade with France, three senior Israeli sources confirmed to The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday morning, with the Defense Ministry later formally confirming the decision.

Defense Minister Israel Katz and Defense Ministry Director General Amir Baram formally ordered the halt, but a decision of such significance could only be made if it were also a priority for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Sources told the Post that the decision was a result of France adopting a hostile attitude toward Israel over the last two years, forcing Israel to reevaluate how much it could trust sharing its defense products with the country.

It was unclear exactly how the decision would impact both countries, given that France has been boycotting Israeli weapons since midway through the Israel-Hamas War, and given that a source clarified that existing contracts would be honored and private companies could still make deals.

Israel may still purchase defense products from France

While economic ties between the two nations remain intact, defense cooperation has cooled significantly.

However, for larger deals requiring government-to-government involvement, and even for Israeli products that have only defensive characteristics, France may lose significant opportunities.

Germany and other NATO countries have been rushing to purchase Israeli air defense and other systems in response to new threats posed by Russia since Moscow began its ongoing war to try to take over Ukraine in 2022.

Some of the major points of friction between Israel and France have been over Paris’s push to end the war in Gaza prior to a point where Israel’s government believed it could bring Israeli hostages home and keep Hamas down as a future threat.

France also led a wave of countries recognizing a Palestinian state in September 2025, viewed in Jerusalem as a penalty for continuing the war.

In addition, France has pressured Israel to reduce its attacks on Hezbollah during the 2023-2024 conflict, while Israel’s full hostilities remained reduced – but not eliminated – in 2024 and during the current conflict.

Despite the disagreements, France helped defend Israel from Iranian missiles and drones in 2024, and the countries might still cooperate in various intelligence and other capacities.

For example, France helped snap back global nuclear sanctions on Iran in the summer of 2025.

Nevertheless, President Emmanuel Macron halted the flow of French weaponry to Israel in late 2024, citing the humanitarian toll of the war in Gaza, and for the past two years has blocked Israeli defense companies from exhibiting at arms fairs in the country.

More specifically, the Defense Ministry said that France prevented the participation of dozens of Israeli defense companies at EuroSTORY 2024, blocking the Israeli defense industries’ exhibition booths at the 2025 Paris Air Show, freezing export licenses to Israel, the UN declaration of a Palestinian state at the height of the fighting with Lebanon, and the recent prohibition on Israeli aircraft carrying munitions intended for operations against Iran from overflying French airspace.

Next, the ministry said that it views the French government’s policy "with serious concern," as it undermines security cooperation with Israel, a country that is actively operating on the front line against Iran and protecting the security of the Western world.

France is actively obstructing the transfer of munitions to Israel, which is engaged in operations against Iran – a country whose ballistic missiles are capable of reaching European cities, including Paris, said the ministry.

Next, the ministry stated that the French prohibition was imposed despite prior coordination, despite clear explanations that the munitions were intended "solely for Iran," and despite the understanding that this effort is critical for European security as well.

In light of these developments, Baram "has decided to reduce all defense procurement from France to zero, replacing it with domestic Israeli procurement or purchases from allied countries.

In line with the Ministry’s strategy, "Israel will continue to build full defense autonomy, without relying on unreliable countries" that fail to meet their obligations and prioritize political moves over the security of Western citizens.

Additionally, the National Security Council and the Ministry of Defense have informed the French Minister of Armed Forces that "we do not intend to hold a meeting with her, and that there will be no new professional engagement with the French military."

A meeting between the sides had been planned for the near future.
Later, US President Donald Trump slammed Macron and France for being "very unhelpful" in the war with Iran.

"The Country of France wouldn’t let planes headed to Israel, loaded up with military supplies, fly over French territory," he wrote in a Truth Social post.

"France has been VERY UNHELPFUL with respect to the “Butcher of Iran,” who has been successfully eliminated! The U.S.A. will REMEMBER!!! President DJT."

Anna Ahronheim contributed to the report.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

And in follow-up new news (April 10 2026): Israel excludes France from talks with Lebanon, sources tell 'Post'

fulltext

Israel excludes France from talks with Lebanon, sources tell 'Post'

An Israeli official said that “France’s conduct over the past year...has led Israel to view France as an unfair mediator.”

ByAMICHAI STEIN

APRIL 10, 2026

Israel has refused to allow France to be involved in the direct talks between it and Lebanon, which are set to begin on Tuesday in Washington, two sources told The Jerusalem Post on Friday.

An Israeli official said that “France’s conduct over the past year – including initiatives aimed at limiting Israel’s ability to fight in Iran, and a complete lack of willingness to take concrete steps to help Lebanon disarm Hezbollah – has led Israel to view France as an unfair mediator.”

The Israeli decision follows growing anger over France’s behavior in recent months, particularly since the joint Israeli-American strike against Iran. France refused to allow US aircraft carrying weapons to Israel to pass through its airspace.

In addition, since Hezbollah began firing a day after the Israeli-American strike on Iran, French President Emmanuel Macron and other senior French officials have been pressuring Israel not to launch a ground operation in Lebanon.

Lebanon tries to hold direct negotiations

Lebanon itself has, in recent weeks, sought to hold direct negotiations with Israel, mainly to prevent a large-scale Israeli military operation in the country. These overtures were made through both senior officials in the Trump administration and officials in the French government.

While the Trump administration told the Lebanese, “First take serious steps to disarm Hezbollah, and then we will speak with Israel,” the French government, led by Macron, who also spoke several times with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the issue, attempted to promote direct talks.

However, Israel showed little interest, maintaining that the Lebanese government is not acting against Hezbollah and that Israel therefore has no choice but to operate on Lebanese territory itself.

The shift in Israel’s position – and its decision to proceed with talks with Lebanon – comes after significant strikes and operations against the terrorist organization, as well as following a US request, including during a conversation between Netanyahu and Trump, to “scale back” military activity in Lebanon to allow negotiations with Iran to move forward.

The representatives in the talks, which are expected to begin Tuesday at the State Department, will be Israel’s Ambassador to Washington, Yechiel Leiter, and Lebanon’s Ambassador to the US, Nada Hamadeh. The American mediator will be Michel Issa, the US ambassador to Lebanon.

Lebanon’s presidency said that Lebanon and Israel held their first contact via a telephone call between their ambassadors in Washington on Friday, with the participation of the US ambassador to Lebanon.

The statement said the call was part of diplomatic efforts aimed at securing a ceasefire and launching negotiations, adding that the two sides agreed to hold a first meeting on Tuesday at the US State Department under American mediation.

Reuters contributed to this report.

(Boy, those JP stenographers sure do a good job don't they? You almost forget what you are reading is "journalism" and not a direct press release from the israeli state. Other sources I found were just rephrasing the above, but less clearly.)

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
200 points (100.0% liked)

news

24747 readers
376 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS