184
Reclaiming the desktop: Why I’m still on Linux in 2026
(the.unknown-universe.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
184 points (98.4% liked)
Linux
63789 readers
811 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Sure, but being good out of the box is very important for normal users. Power users love the crazy customization. Normal people don't really care.
Fair point, but out of the box KDE has pretty sane defaults these days. It's a very inoffensive desktop.
I have just a couple customizations that I do immediately on a fresh install, but it certainly wouldn't kill me to use it as it comes.
I know but I don't really care whether my OS is good for normal users. In fact the more it is the less I'll like it.
Normal users love someone taking control and all their data and telling them what's what. A "Linux for the masses" will be inevitably pure trash, something akin to ChromeOS now (which is kinda already linux for the masses). They literally want all the things we hate. For a company to know everything about them, to take all their data, to tell them what they can do and they can't so they feel 'safe'.
As soon as Linux becomes a masses thing, it means lots of money can be made off it, and companies will jump on it to enshittify it as much as they can. So I'm really hoping that "the year of Linux on the desktop" will never happen.
I recently wrote about why the year of Linux might actually be a trap. Most users want control handed to them even if it means giving up their privacy. If Linux goes mainstream, it could lose what makes it special.
https://the.unknown-universe.co.uk/privacy-security/year-of-linux-trap/
Whether or not Linux becomes a mainstream option and loses much of its appeal in the process creating a schism between 'sanitised linux' and 'free rebel' linux with the latter being sidelined because of various attestation and verification schemes stopping you from actually doing anything useful with your free-rebel computer; doesn't sound like it would actually make a huge difference.
If all the recent rise in popularity and usability and adoption of linux stopped dead in its tracks today or even went backwards, and also the dystopian future you fear about mandatory face scans becomes reality, those using linux will get sidelined and put in to a 'digital exile'; if insetad it does continue to rise and erode some of the share of desktops that windows enjoys and you end up with the 'sanitised linux' you're afraid of causing a divide amongst the linux community, then you just get the same outcome for those that refuse to use the sanitised versions and insist on their 'free rebel' versions.
Either outcome, doesn't sound like it's any worse the other really, but at least in the interim, greater mainstream embrace of linux would be better and even in long term where it might get sanitised, it could still be a better outcome depending upon just how badly compromised the 'sanitised linux' actually turns out to be.
In the end, this sanitised linux could be worse than windows and ultimately the situation wouldn't really have changed much since at that point 'free-rebel' linux basically just becomes what was always 'linux' and 'sanitised linux' is just 'something else, not really linux in most people's estimation.' The two scenarios look kinda the same to me.