194

[Redacted] (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 week ago by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] acidic7_7@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't some of that be offset by less oil being burned due to the destruction of infrastructure though?

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

A lot of that oil is still being burned which is what happens when you light an oil field on fire

[-] acidic7_7@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

I should've thought about that, I was just looking for a possible silver lining

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

I also might be wrong idk if oil fields are actively burning

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026

194 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14346 readers

619 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS