200
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Iranians celebrating the beginning of the ceasefire under the framework of Iran's 10 Points.


Mere hours before Trump's 8pm Tuesday deadline yesterday, Pakistan's government contacted Iran with a US-written proposal for a two-week ceasefire, explicitly stated to also include Lebanon, during which they would negotiate a permanent end to the war on the basis of Iran's 10 Points. Among other things, these points include 1) maintaining strict control (joint with Oman) over Hormuz, complete with a toll; 2) the end of sanctions on Iran; 3) keeping their enriched uranium; 4) a withdrawal of US forces from the Middle East [stated by the Supreme Leadership Council but not in the 10 Points, so who knows], and 5) some plausible guarantee that Iran would never be attacked again. I've heard rumors that China may have prodded Iran to accept these terms.

In theory, these are relatively confident and maximalist demands. In practice, Iran has already achieved military and economic control over Hormuz and the withdrawal of many US troops and bases from the region, so at least a few of Iran's demands are, to a greater or lesser extent, already achieved, and with little hope for an increasingly exhausted US to undo these achievements short of nukes.

A couple hours after the ceasefire, the Zionist entity began a wave of airstrikes in Lebanon, killing hundreds of civilians, as well as flying drones into Iranian airspace. This was a strange move to make even if you assume - very sensibly - that the US is completely agreement non-capable: why not agree to the ceasefire and simply pretend to negotiate for two weeks while regrouping/repairing what assets you can and then start hitting Iran again?

One theory is that the Zionists are testing to what degree Iran is actually willing to have solidarity with Lebanon and Hezbollah. While the Resistance has been relatively united since October 7th, the formation of separate peaces instead of negotiating terms as a united front has been a major exploitable weakness. Alternatively, it's been proposed that the US didn't even consider using the ceasefire to regroup and deceive Iran, and that Trump merely wanted a way to chicken out of his threat on Iran's electrical grid - the fact that US officials have since stated that Iran's 10 Points were not the same ones they agreed to is a point supporting this, I suppose. If the conflict resumes and Trump does not deliver another 48 hour deadline (and/or makes it something silly like a month from now) then this could be the explanation.

From Iran, I am getting the sense that a lot is happening behind the scenes. Statements from top officials like Araghchi have stated quite plainly that there will be no ceasefire and no negotiations unless the Zionists stop attacking Lebanon, but as of ~24 hours after the ceasefire began, there has been no significant military response from Iran yet. There have apparently been phone calls between Araghchi and numerous regional officials, but it is unknown to what end. All the while, the global economic situation continues to deteriorate. Over the next week or two, the last tankers that left Hormuz before it closed will arrive at their destinations. If the missile exchanges begin once more, then the West, much like most of the rest of the world, will be experiencing all sorts of fuel, energy, food, and product shortages while trying to justify why they broke the ceasefire to kill more Lebanese civilians.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://archive.ph/RCUe7

Taipei Is ‘Fiddling While Rome Burns’

Former U.S. admiral accuses Taiwanese political leaders of moving too slowly on defense reform

more

A retired admiral from the U.S. Navy made an extraordinary intervention in Taiwan’s political and military debate today, excoriating delays to military preparedness. Mark Montgomery is back in Taiwan, participating in a tabletop wargame that simulates Chinese pressure on Taiwan. In an audience question-and-answer session before the games started, he asked a panel that included senior Taiwanese leaders whether Taiwan is prepared to make the necessary sacrifices needed to reform its military reserves.

"will they make the necessary sacrifices?", asks man from country which just wasted thousands of munitions that were supposed to be used for China

Chen Yeong-kang (陳永康), a sitting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, former head of the Taiwanese navy, and the organizer of the wargame, and Alexander Huang (黃介正), the former director of international affairs for the KMT, discussed among other issues the legal challenges to reform. That was when Montgomery fired back from the floor. “You’re fiddling while Rome burns,” he said. Montgomery is no stranger to Taiwan. He participated in the same table top wargame last year and frequently meets with senior leaders, including the president. He was a key contributor to “The Boiling Moat,” a book that laid out a pathway for Taiwan to improve its military position versus China. Montgomery’s question to the panel laid out three challenges that Taiwan faces if it wants to effectively reform the reserves.

  1. Can Taiwan find 200,000 citizens who are prepared to sacrifice one weekend a month and two to three weeks each summer for training?
  2. Can Taiwanese companies honor and support the people being gone that long without any punishment?
  3. Is the Taiwanese army prepared to sacrifice two active duty brigades, freeing up the personnel to train 20 effective reserve brigades?

lol, imagine needing to beg the capitalist class to give your citizenry enough days off to go through military training classic

isn't the fucking government supposed to support soldiers during training? like, what the hell?

also, what even is this system supposed to be, the reason conscription is usually supposed to happen right after you get out of school (sometimes to be deferred until college) is precisely so you go through it before joining the workforce - because, y'know, flipping the timeline on those around obviously leads to this exact, very-easy-to-predict problem of needing to manage how people's employment is going to be dealt with while they're off spelunking at base

In his answer, Chen raised the issues of Taiwan’s low birth rate not providing enough young men for the reserves, and a problem of the military generally lacking sufficient English capability to operate newly purchased U.S. weapons. Then, he said that Taiwan would need to modify the law to allow more training time. Huang developed the point. To gain time, Taiwan needs to “amend the law, deal with the legal system and deal with the brain cells of politicians.” He added that Taiwan only has one level of reserve mobilization, he said, all-out mobilization. There is no ability to partially mobilize in response to a developing crisis, and companies and government departments are not going to do anything unless legally required. This was when Montgomery raised his hand and delivered his “Fiddling while Rome burns” blow. Finland and Estonia are not talking about esoteric legal issues, he said, they are taking action. He questioned whether Taiwanese children think about military service in the same way that Israelis or Finns do.

There’s only one country prepared to sacrifice its children for your independence, Montgomery said, and it was unclear whether he was addressing the speakers, the room at large or the entirety of Taiwan.

oh get fucked jagoff

Then he issued a pretty stark warning: “This is not a party issue. This is a societal issue. And if you don’t attack it aggressively in a bipartisan, together, national way, you’re going to find the one ally you have left is not excited or motivated.” It’s the second time in two weeks that Montgomery has spoken up. At a Future Maritime Defense Symposium at the Legislative Yuan on April 7, he said that U.S President Donald Trump could “collectively punish” Taiwan for not raising defense spending to 5% of GDP in the next few years. He explained that Trump doesn’t care about Taiwanese domestic politics and won’t make allowances for budgets having been blocked by the opposition. “Trump wouldn’t know the DDP [the governing Democratic Progressive Party] from the KMT if his life depended on it,” he said. I asked Montgomery why he seemed a bit punchier on this visit to Taiwan. “It’s one year closer,” he said. Not to 2027 specifically, but one year closer to Chinese leader Xi Jinping (習近平) making a decision to move, perhaps with economic coercion rather than militarily. “The defense budget becoming a political football is completely unacceptable,” he added. Taiwan’s reserves are not in an acceptable state, Montgomery reiterated. “I’m not going to say they’re a joke, but they’re extremely unprepared and unaligned for the mission they need to have.”

Taiwan launched reforms to its reserve system under former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) that are still being implemented. The conscription period has increased from four months to one year, and there is more training for advanced weapons. But because most conscripts defer their service until after university, they are still under the old regime. Most were still only doing four months last year. It shouldn’t be difficult to amend the rules on mobilization, Huang told me, but the government needs to communicate much better about security to explain to the Taiwanese people. There are lower level changes that can be made by presidential order without bipartisan support, he added. Montgomery sees a lot of work that needs to be done, and neither of Taiwan’s two main political parties working on it. “When you ask questions, you get these kind of answers, you know, ‘We have legislative and legal issues,’” he told me. “Fix them.”

man from country famous for its ineffectual government that constantly gets hung up on procedural issues when it tries to do anything (except murder brown people overseas) - "just fix your legislative issues lmao"

personally, I think countries should be allowed to just shoot any American who shows up in their land and starts whining "don't siege Leningrad, take it immediately" at them I-was-saying

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

lol imagine thinking there is anything Taiwan can do to change the fact that they will be steamrolled in any conflict with the mainland

Genocidal maniac demands entire population of island die for nothing

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
200 points (100.0% liked)

news

24749 readers
303 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS